Commit 10184a8a authored by Lucas De Marchi's avatar Lucas De Marchi

drm/i915/lnl: Extend C10/C20 phy

For Lunar Lake, DDI-A is connected to C10 PHY, while TC1-TC3 are connected
to C20 phy, like in Meteor Lake. Update the check in intel_is_c10phy()
accordingly.

This reverts the change in commit e388ae97 ("drm/i915/display:
Eliminate IS_METEORLAKE checks") that turned that into a display engine
version check. The phy <-> port connection is very SoC-specific and not
related to that version.

IS_LUNARLAKE() is defined to 0 in i915 as it's expected that the
(upcoming) xe driver is the one defining the platform, with i915 only
driving the display side.

Bspec: 70818
Reviewed-by: default avatarGustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231026184045.1015655-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
parent 8d68a0ac
......@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
bool intel_is_c10phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum phy phy)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(14, 0) && phy < PHY_C)
if ((IS_LUNARLAKE(i915) || IS_METEORLAKE(i915)) && phy < PHY_C)
return true;
return false;
......
......@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
#define IS_DG2(i915) IS_PLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2)
#define IS_PONTEVECCHIO(i915) IS_PLATFORM(i915, INTEL_PONTEVECCHIO)
#define IS_METEORLAKE(i915) IS_PLATFORM(i915, INTEL_METEORLAKE)
#define IS_LUNARLAKE(i915) 0
#define IS_DG2_G10(i915) \
IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment