Commit 13859c98 authored by Christoph Hellwig's avatar Christoph Hellwig Committed by Darrick J. Wong

xfs: cleanup xfs_log_unmount_write

Move the code for verifying the iclog state on a clean unmount into a
helper, and instead of checking the iclog state just rely on the shutdown
check as they are equivalent.  Also remove the ifdef DEBUG as the
compiler is smart enough to eliminate the dead code for non-debug builds.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
parent 6178d104
......@@ -946,6 +946,18 @@ xfs_log_write_unmount_record(
}
}
static void
xfs_log_unmount_verify_iclog(
struct xlog *log)
{
struct xlog_in_core *iclog = log->l_iclog;
do {
ASSERT(iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE);
ASSERT(iclog->ic_offset == 0);
} while ((iclog = iclog->ic_next) != log->l_iclog);
}
/*
* Unmount record used to have a string "Unmount filesystem--" in the
* data section where the "Un" was really a magic number (XLOG_UNMOUNT_TYPE).
......@@ -954,13 +966,10 @@ xfs_log_write_unmount_record(
* As far as I know, there weren't any dependencies on the old behaviour.
*/
static void
xfs_log_unmount_write(xfs_mount_t *mp)
xfs_log_unmount_write(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
struct xlog *log = mp->m_log;
xlog_in_core_t *iclog;
#ifdef DEBUG
xlog_in_core_t *first_iclog;
#endif
struct xlog *log = mp->m_log;
/*
* Don't write out unmount record on norecovery mounts or ro devices.
......@@ -974,18 +983,9 @@ xfs_log_unmount_write(xfs_mount_t *mp)
xfs_log_force(mp, XFS_LOG_SYNC);
#ifdef DEBUG
first_iclog = iclog = log->l_iclog;
do {
if (iclog->ic_state != XLOG_STATE_IOERROR) {
ASSERT(iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE);
ASSERT(iclog->ic_offset == 0);
}
iclog = iclog->ic_next;
} while (iclog != first_iclog);
#endif
if (XLOG_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(log))
return;
xfs_log_unmount_verify_iclog(log);
xfs_log_write_unmount_record(mp);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment