Commit 13c432b5 authored by Eric W. Biederman's avatar Eric W. Biederman

exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h7wq6zc1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.orgReviewed-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
parent 7a60ef48
...@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec) ...@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec)
* Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be * Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be
* seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal * seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal
* signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised * signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised
* (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below). * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below).
*/ */
int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
{ {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment