Commit 17d75422 authored by Barry Song's avatar Barry Song Committed by Andrew Morton

mm: document __GFP_NOFAIL must be blockable

Non-blocking allocation with __GFP_NOFAIL is not supported and may still
result in NULL pointers (if we don't return NULL, we result in busy-loop
within non-sleepable contexts):

static inline struct page *
__alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
						struct alloc_context *ac)
{
	...
	/*
	 * Make sure that __GFP_NOFAIL request doesn't leak out and make sure
	 * we always retry
	 */
	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
		/*
		 * All existing users of the __GFP_NOFAIL are blockable, so warn
		 * of any new users that actually require GFP_NOWAIT
		 */
		if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(!can_direct_reclaim, gfp_mask))
			goto fail;
		...
	}
	...
fail:
	warn_alloc(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask,
			"page allocation failure: order:%u", order);
got_pg:
	return page;
}

Highlight this in the documentation of __GFP_NOFAIL so that non-mm
subsystems can reject any illegal usage of __GFP_NOFAIL with GFP_ATOMIC,
GFP_NOWAIT, etc.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240830202823.21478-3-21cnbao@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarBarry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: default avatarVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: Hailong.Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 955abe0a
......@@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ enum {
* the caller still has to check for failures) while costly requests try to be
* not disruptive and back off even without invoking the OOM killer.
* The following three modifiers might be used to override some of these
* implicit rules.
* implicit rules. Please note that all of them must be used along with
* %__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM flag.
*
* %__GFP_NORETRY: The VM implementation will try only very lightweight
* memory direct reclaim to get some memory under memory pressure (thus
......@@ -246,6 +247,8 @@ enum {
* cannot handle allocation failures. The allocation could block
* indefinitely but will never return with failure. Testing for
* failure is pointless.
* It _must_ be blockable and used together with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.
* It should _never_ be used in non-sleepable contexts.
* New users should be evaluated carefully (and the flag should be
* used only when there is no reasonable failure policy) but it is
* definitely preferable to use the flag rather than opencode endless
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment