Commit 1802992e authored by Andrew Elble's avatar Andrew Elble Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

nfsd: fix clp->cl_revoked list deletion causing softlock in nfsd

commit c876486b upstream.

commit 2d4a532d ("nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is
protected by clp->cl_lock") removed the use of the reaplist to
clean out clp->cl_revoked. It failed to change list_entry() to
walk clp->cl_revoked.next instead of reaplist.next

Fixes: 2d4a532d ("nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock")
Reported-by: default avatarEric Meddaugh <etmsys@rit.edu>
Tested-by: default avatarEric Meddaugh <etmsys@rit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Elble <aweits@rit.edu>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent e00076b7
......@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_revoked)) {
dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
dp = list_entry(clp->cl_revoked.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment