Commit 1886ab01 authored by Roberto Sassu's avatar Roberto Sassu Committed by Mimi Zohar

evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for unmodified metadata

With the patch to allow xattr/attr operations if a portable signature
verification fails, cp and tar can copy all xattrs/attrs so that at the
end of the process verification succeeds.

However, it might happen that the xattrs/attrs are already set to the
correct value (taken at signing time) and signature verification succeeds
before the copy has completed. For example, an archive might contains files
owned by root and the archive is extracted by root.

Then, since portable signatures are immutable, all subsequent operations
fail (e.g. fchown()), even if the operation is legitimate (does not alter
the current value).

This patch avoids this problem by reporting successful operation to user
space when that operation does not alter the current value of xattrs/attrs.

With this patch, the one that introduces evm_hmac_disabled() and the one
that allows a metadata operation on the INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE error, EVM
portable signatures can be used without disabling metadata verification
(by setting EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES). Due to keeping metadata
verification enabled, altering immutable metadata protected with a portable
signature that was successfully verified will be denied (existing
behavior).

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> [implicit declaration of function]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
parent 7e135dc7
......@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/integrity.h>
#include <linux/evm.h>
#include <linux/magic.h>
#include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
#include <crypto/hash.h>
#include <crypto/hash_info.h>
......@@ -330,6 +331,92 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_current_integrity(struct dentry *dentry)
return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL);
}
/*
* evm_xattr_acl_change - check if passed ACL changes the inode mode
* @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount
* @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
* @xattr_name: requested xattr
* @xattr_value: requested xattr value
* @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length
*
* Check if passed ACL changes the inode mode, which is protected by EVM.
*
* Returns 1 if passed ACL causes inode mode change, 0 otherwise.
*/
static int evm_xattr_acl_change(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
umode_t mode;
struct posix_acl *acl = NULL, *acl_res;
struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
int rc;
/*
* user_ns is not relevant here, ACL_USER/ACL_GROUP don't have impact
* on the inode mode (see posix_acl_equiv_mode()).
*/
acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(&init_user_ns, xattr_value, xattr_value_len);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(acl))
return 1;
acl_res = acl;
/*
* Passing mnt_userns is necessary to correctly determine the GID in
* an idmapped mount, as the GID is used to clear the setgid bit in
* the inode mode.
*/
rc = posix_acl_update_mode(mnt_userns, inode, &mode, &acl_res);
posix_acl_release(acl);
if (rc)
return 1;
if (inode->i_mode != mode)
return 1;
#endif
return 0;
}
/*
* evm_xattr_change - check if passed xattr value differs from current value
* @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount
* @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
* @xattr_name: requested xattr
* @xattr_value: requested xattr value
* @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length
*
* Check if passed xattr value differs from current value.
*
* Returns 1 if passed xattr value differs from current value, 0 otherwise.
*/
static int evm_xattr_change(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
{
char *xattr_data = NULL;
int rc = 0;
if (posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name))
return evm_xattr_acl_change(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name,
xattr_value, xattr_value_len);
rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(&init_user_ns, dentry, xattr_name, &xattr_data,
0, GFP_NOFS);
if (rc < 0)
return 1;
if (rc == xattr_value_len)
rc = !!memcmp(xattr_value, xattr_data, rc);
else
rc = 1;
kfree(xattr_data);
return rc;
}
/*
* evm_protect_xattr - protect the EVM extended attribute
*
......@@ -397,7 +484,13 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE)
return 0;
if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS)
if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE &&
!evm_xattr_change(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
xattr_value_len))
return 0;
if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS &&
evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE)
integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry),
dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata",
integrity_status_msg[evm_status],
......@@ -553,6 +646,19 @@ void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name)
evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0);
}
static int evm_attr_change(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
{
struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid;
if ((!(ia_valid & ATTR_UID) || uid_eq(attr->ia_uid, inode->i_uid)) &&
(!(ia_valid & ATTR_GID) || gid_eq(attr->ia_gid, inode->i_gid)) &&
(!(ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) || attr->ia_mode == inode->i_mode))
return 0;
return 1;
}
/**
* evm_inode_setattr - prevent updating an invalid EVM extended attribute
* @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
......@@ -584,6 +690,11 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
(evm_hmac_disabled() && (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL ||
evm_status == INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN)))
return 0;
if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE &&
!evm_attr_change(dentry, attr))
return 0;
integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry),
dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata",
integrity_status_msg[evm_status], -EPERM, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment