Commit 1896d256 authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Martin Schwidefsky

s390/cmpxchg: fix sign extension bugs

For 1 and 2 byte operands for xchg and cmpxchg the old and new values
get or'ed into the larger 4 byte old value before the compare and swap
instruction gets executed. This is done without using the proper byte
mask before or'ing the values.
If the caller passed in negative old or new values these got sign
extended by the caller. Which in turn means that either the old value
never matches, or, even worse, unrelated bytes would be changed in memory.

Luckily there don't seem to be any callers around yet, since that would
have resulted in the specification exception fixed in an earlies patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent bf3db853
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, void *ptr, int size)
" cs %0,0,%4\n"
" jl 0b\n"
: "=&d" (old), "=Q" (*(int *) addr)
: "d" (x << shift), "d" (~(255 << shift)),
: "d" ((x & 0xff) << shift), "d" (~(0xff << shift)),
"Q" (*(int *) addr) : "memory", "cc", "0");
return old >> shift;
case 2:
......@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, void *ptr, int size)
" cs %0,0,%4\n"
" jl 0b\n"
: "=&d" (old), "=Q" (*(int *) addr)
: "d" (x << shift), "d" (~(65535 << shift)),
: "d" ((x & 0xffff) << shift), "d" (~(0xffff << shift)),
"Q" (*(int *) addr) : "memory", "cc", "0");
return old >> shift;
case 4:
......@@ -114,8 +114,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(void *ptr, unsigned long old,
" jnz 0b\n"
"1:"
: "=&d" (prev), "=&d" (tmp), "+Q" (*(int *) addr)
: "d" (old << shift), "d" (new << shift),
"d" (~(255 << shift))
: "d" ((old & 0xff) << shift),
"d" ((new & 0xff) << shift),
"d" (~(0xff << shift))
: "memory", "cc");
return prev >> shift;
case 2:
......@@ -135,8 +136,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(void *ptr, unsigned long old,
" jnz 0b\n"
"1:"
: "=&d" (prev), "=&d" (tmp), "+Q" (*(int *) addr)
: "d" (old << shift), "d" (new << shift),
"d" (~(65535 << shift))
: "d" ((old & 0xffff) << shift),
"d" ((new & 0xffff) << shift),
"d" (~(0xffff << shift))
: "memory", "cc");
return prev >> shift;
case 4:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment