Commit 194d99c7 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online()

The recover_policy is unsed in cpufreq_online() to indicate whether
a new policy object is created or an existing one is reinitialized.

The "recover" part of the name is slightly confusing (it should be
"reinitialization" rather than "recovery") and the logical not (!)
operator is applied to it in almost all of the checks it is used in,
so replace that variable with a new one called "new_policy" that
will be true in the case of a new policy creation.

While at it, drop one of the labels that is jumped to from only
one spot.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
parent 0b275352
......@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool notify)
static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
bool recover_policy;
bool new_policy;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int j;
int ret;
......@@ -1209,13 +1209,13 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
/* This is the only online CPU for the policy. Start over. */
recover_policy = true;
new_policy = false;
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
policy->cpu = cpu;
policy->governor = NULL;
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
} else {
recover_policy = false;
new_policy = true;
policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(cpu);
if (!policy)
return -ENOMEM;
......@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (!recover_policy) {
if (new_policy) {
/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
cpumask_or(policy->related_cpus, policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
/* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
......@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
*/
cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
if (!recover_policy) {
if (new_policy) {
policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
......@@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_START, policy);
if (!recover_policy) {
if (new_policy) {
ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy);
if (ret)
goto out_exit_policy;
......@@ -1324,10 +1324,12 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: %d (%d)\n",
__func__, cpu, ret);
goto out_remove_policy_notify;
/* cpufreq_policy_free() will notify based on this */
new_policy = false;
goto out_exit_policy;
}
if (!recover_policy) {
if (new_policy) {
policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
}
......@@ -1343,16 +1345,13 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
out_remove_policy_notify:
/* cpufreq_policy_free() will notify based on this */
recover_policy = true;
out_exit_policy:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
out_free_policy:
cpufreq_policy_free(policy, recover_policy);
cpufreq_policy_free(policy, !new_policy);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment