Commit 1a1e4530 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo Committed by Jens Axboe

bdi: explain the dirty list transferring in bdi_destroy()

bdi_destroy() has code to transfer the remaining dirty inodes to the
default_backing_dev_info; however, given the shutdown sequence, it
isn't clear how such condition would happen.  Also, it isn't a full
solution as the transferred inodes stlil point to the bdi which is
being destroyed.  Operations on those inodes can end up accessing
already released fields such as the percpu stat fields.

Digging through the history, it seems that the code was added as a
quick workaround for a bug report without fully root-causing the
issue.  We probably want to remove the code in time but for now let's
add a comment noting that it is a quick workaround.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
parent c0ea1c22
......@@ -475,8 +475,17 @@ void bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
int i;
/*
* Splice our entries to the default_backing_dev_info, if this
* bdi disappears
* Splice our entries to the default_backing_dev_info. This
* condition shouldn't happen. @wb must be empty at this point and
* dirty inodes on it might cause other issues. This workaround is
* added by ce5f8e779519 ("writeback: splice dirty inode entries to
* default bdi on bdi_destroy()") without root-causing the issue.
*
* http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1253038617-30204-11-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/35341/focus=35350
*
* We should probably add WARN_ON() to find out whether it still
* happens and track it down if so.
*/
if (bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi)) {
struct bdi_writeback *dst = &default_backing_dev_info.wb;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment