Commit 1c4f0dd9 authored by Yasuyuki Kozakai's avatar Yasuyuki Kozakai Committed by Adrian Bunk

[NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack: don't track locally generated special ICMP error

The conntrack assigned to locally generated ICMP error is usually the one
assigned to the original packet which has caused the error. But if
the original packet is handled as invalid by nf_conntrack, no conntrack
is assigned to the original packet. Then nf_ct_attach() cannot assign
any conntrack to the ICMP error packet. In that case the current
nf_conntrack_icmp assigns appropriate conntrack to it. But the current
code mistakes the direction of the packet. As a result, NAT code mistakes
the address to be mangled.

To fix the bug, this changes nf_conntrack_icmp not to assign conntrack
to such ICMP error. Actually no address is necessary to be mangled
in this case.

Spotted by Jordan Russell.

Upstream commit ID: 130e7a83Signed-off-by: default avatarYasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
parent 4de63254
......@@ -193,25 +193,13 @@ icmp_error_message(struct sk_buff *skb,
h = nf_conntrack_find_get(&innertuple, NULL);
if (!h) {
/* Locally generated ICMPs will match inverted if they
haven't been SNAT'ed yet */
/* FIXME: NAT code has to handle half-done double NAT --RR */
if (hooknum == NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT)
h = nf_conntrack_find_get(&origtuple, NULL);
if (!h) {
DEBUGP("icmp_error_message: no match\n");
return -NF_ACCEPT;
}
/* Reverse direction from that found */
if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
*ctinfo += IP_CT_IS_REPLY;
} else {
if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
*ctinfo += IP_CT_IS_REPLY;
DEBUGP("icmp_error_message: no match\n");
return -NF_ACCEPT;
}
if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
*ctinfo += IP_CT_IS_REPLY;
/* Update skb to refer to this connection */
skb->nfct = &nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h)->ct_general;
skb->nfctinfo = *ctinfo;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment