Commit 1ce0e82b authored by WANG Cong's avatar WANG Cong Committed by Sasha Levin

igmp: add a missing spin_lock_init()

[ Upstream commit b4846fc3 ]

Andrey reported a lockdep warning on non-initialized
spinlock:

 INFO: trying to register non-static key.
 the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
 turning off the locking correctness validator.
 CPU: 1 PID: 4099 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.12.0-rc6+ #9
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:16
  dump_stack+0x292/0x395 lib/dump_stack.c:52
  register_lock_class+0x717/0x1aa0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:755
  ? 0xffffffffa0000000
  __lock_acquire+0x269/0x3690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3255
  lock_acquire+0x22d/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
  __raw_spin_lock_bh ./include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135
  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175
  spin_lock_bh ./include/linux/spinlock.h:304
  ip_mc_clear_src+0x27/0x1e0 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2076
  igmpv3_clear_delrec+0xee/0x4f0 net/ipv4/igmp.c:1194
  ip_mc_destroy_dev+0x4e/0x190 net/ipv4/igmp.c:1736

We miss a spin_lock_init() in igmpv3_add_delrec(), probably
because previously we never use it on this code path. Since
we already unlink it from the global mc_tomb list, it is
probably safe not to acquire this spinlock here. It does not
harm to have it although, to avoid conditional locking.

Fixes: c38b7d32 ("igmp: acquire pmc lock for ip_mc_clear_src()")
Reported-by: default avatarAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
parent 03a6d9d9
......@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ static void igmpv3_add_delrec(struct in_device *in_dev, struct ip_mc_list *im)
pmc = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmc)
return;
spin_lock_init(&pmc->lock);
spin_lock_bh(&im->lock);
pmc->interface = im->interface;
in_dev_hold(in_dev);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment