Commit 1fc12b05 authored by Douglas Anderson's avatar Douglas Anderson Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: core: Avoid propagating to supplies when possible

When we called regulator_enable() on a regulator we'd end up
propagating that call all the way up the chain every time.  This is a
bit of a waste of time.  A child regulator already refcounts its own
enables so it should avoid passing on to its parent unless the
refcount transitioned between 0 and 1.

Historically this hasn't been a huge problem since we skipped dealing
with enable for always-on regulators.  In a previous patch, however,
we removed the always-on optimization.  On one system, the debugfs
regulator_summary was now showing a "use_count" of 33 for a top-level
regulator.

Let's implement this optimization.  This turns out to be fairly
trivial with the recent reorganization of the regulator core.

NOTE: as part of this patch I'll make "always-on" regulators start
with a use count of 1.  This keeps the counts clean when recursively
resolving regulators.

ALSO NOTE: this commit also contains somewhat of a bug fix to
regulator_force_disable().  It was incorrectly looping over
"rdev->open_count" when it should have been looping over use_count.
We have to touch that code anyway (since we should no longer loop at
all), so we'll fix it together in one patch.  Also: since this comes
after commit f8702f9e ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for
regulators locking") we can now move to use _regulator_disable() for
our supply and keep it in the lock.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent 5451781d
......@@ -1822,6 +1822,7 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
rdev->supply = NULL;
return ret;
}
rdev->use_count = 1;
}
return 0;
......@@ -2491,7 +2492,7 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
lockdep_assert_held_once(&rdev->mutex.base);
if (rdev->supply) {
if (rdev->use_count == 0 && rdev->supply) {
ret = _regulator_enable(rdev->supply);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
......@@ -2539,7 +2540,7 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
_regulator_handle_consumer_disable(regulator);
err_disable_supply:
if (rdev->supply)
if (rdev->use_count == 0 && rdev->supply)
_regulator_disable(rdev->supply);
return ret;
......@@ -2648,7 +2649,7 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
if (ret == 0 && rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled > 1)
ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, PM_SUSPEND_ON);
if (ret == 0 && rdev->supply)
if (ret == 0 && rdev->use_count == 0 && rdev->supply)
ret = _regulator_disable(rdev->supply);
return ret;
......@@ -2733,11 +2734,10 @@ int regulator_force_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
ret = drms_uA_update(rdev);
}
regulator_unlock_dependent(rdev, &ww_ctx);
if (rdev->use_count != 0 && rdev->supply)
_regulator_disable(rdev->supply);
if (rdev->supply)
while (rdev->open_count--)
regulator_disable(rdev->supply);
regulator_unlock_dependent(rdev, &ww_ctx);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment