Commit 1ffc6f35 authored by Christophe JAILLET's avatar Christophe JAILLET Committed by Vinod Koul

dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix return value check for dma_set_mask_and_coherent()

The commit in the Fixes: tag has changed the logic of the code and now it
is likely that the probe will return an early success (0), even if not
completely executed.

This should lead to a crash or similar issue later on when the code
accesses to some never allocated resources.

Change the '!err' into a 'err' when checking if
'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()' has failed or not.

While at it, simplify the code and remove the "can't success code" related
to 32 DMA mask.
As stated in [1], 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent(DMA_BIT_MASK(64))' can't fail
if 'dev->dma_mask' is non-NULL. And if it is NULL, it would fail for the
same reason when tried with DMA_BIT_MASK(32).

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398

Fixes: ecb8c88b ("dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/935fbb40ae930c5fe87482a41dcb73abf2257973.1636492127.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.frSigned-off-by: default avatarVinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
parent 88563307
......@@ -187,17 +187,9 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
/* DMA configuration */
err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
if (!err) {
if (err) {
pci_err(pdev, "DMA mask 64 set failed\n");
return err;
} else {
pci_err(pdev, "DMA mask 64 set failed\n");
err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (err) {
pci_err(pdev, "DMA mask 32 set failed\n");
return err;
}
}
/* Data structure allocation */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment