Commit 20102ac5 authored by Jacob Tanenbaum's avatar Jacob Tanenbaum Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpupower: cpupower monitor reports uninitialized values for offline cpus

[root@hp-dl980g7-02 linux]# cpupower monitor
...
5472|   0|   1|******|******|******|******|| 0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00 *is offline
10567|   0| 159|******|******|******|******||  0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00 *is offline
1661206560|859272560| 150|******|******|******|******|| 0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00 *is offline
1661206560|943093104| 140|******|******|******|******|| 0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00|  0.00 *is offline

because of this cpupower also holds the incorrect value for the number
of physical packages in the machine

Changed cpupower to initialize the values of an offline cpu's socket and
core to -1, warn the user that one or more cpus is/are
offline and not print statistics for offline cpus.

This fix hides offlined cores where topology cannot be accessed.
With a recent kernel patch suggested from Prarit Bhargava it may be possible
that soft offlined cores' topology can still be parsed.
This patch would then show which cores in which package/socket are offline,
when sane toplogoy information is available.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJacob Tanenbaum <jtanenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 32b88194
......@@ -73,18 +73,22 @@ int get_cpu_topology(struct cpupower_topology *cpu_top)
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus; cpu++) {
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].cpu = cpu;
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].is_online = sysfs_is_cpu_online(cpu);
if (!cpu_top->core_info[cpu].is_online)
continue;
if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
cpu,
"physical_package_id",
&(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg)) < 0)
return -1;
&(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg)) < 0) {
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg = -1;
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core = -1;
continue;
}
if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
cpu,
"core_id",
&(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core)) < 0)
return -1;
&(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core)) < 0) {
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg = -1;
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core = -1;
continue;
}
}
qsort(cpu_top->core_info, cpus, sizeof(struct cpuid_core_info),
......@@ -95,12 +99,15 @@ int get_cpu_topology(struct cpupower_topology *cpu_top)
done by pkg value. */
last_pkg = cpu_top->core_info[0].pkg;
for(cpu = 1; cpu < cpus; cpu++) {
if(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg != last_pkg) {
if (cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg != last_pkg &&
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg != -1) {
last_pkg = cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg;
cpu_top->pkgs++;
}
}
cpu_top->pkgs++;
if (!cpu_top->core_info[0].pkg == -1)
cpu_top->pkgs++;
/* Intel's cores count is not consecutively numbered, there may
* be a core_id of 3, but none of 2. Assume there always is 0
......
......@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ void print_results(int topology_depth, int cpu)
/* Be careful CPUs may got resorted for pkg value do not just use cpu */
if (!bitmask_isbitset(cpus_chosen, cpu_top.core_info[cpu].cpu))
return;
if (!cpu_top.core_info[cpu].is_online &&
cpu_top.core_info[cpu].pkg == -1)
return;
if (topology_depth > 2)
printf("%4d|", cpu_top.core_info[cpu].pkg);
......@@ -191,7 +194,8 @@ void print_results(int topology_depth, int cpu)
* It's up to the monitor plug-in to check .is_online, this one
* is just for additional info.
*/
if (!cpu_top.core_info[cpu].is_online) {
if (!cpu_top.core_info[cpu].is_online &&
cpu_top.core_info[cpu].pkg != -1) {
printf(_(" *is offline\n"));
return;
} else
......@@ -388,6 +392,9 @@ int cmd_monitor(int argc, char **argv)
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (!cpu_top.core_info[0].is_online)
printf("WARNING: at least one cpu is offline\n");
/* Default is: monitor all CPUs */
if (bitmask_isallclear(cpus_chosen))
bitmask_setall(cpus_chosen);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment