Commit 21020fc8 authored by Ching-Te Ku's avatar Ching-Te Ku Committed by Kalle Valo

rtw88: coex: add debug message

Since coexistence issue is related to WL/BT and each digital/analog/rf,
and these issues are often critical with low failure rate, add more
debugging information is helpful to clarify issues.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChing-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPing-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109085909.9143-11-pkshih@realtek.com
parent ec06c4ad
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -5,12 +5,6 @@
#ifndef __RTW_COEX_H__
#define __RTW_COEX_H__
/* BT profile map bit definition */
#define BPM_HFP BIT(0)
#define BPM_HID BIT(1)
#define BPM_A2DP BIT(2)
#define BPM_PAN BIT(3)
#define COEX_RESP_ACK_BY_WL_FW 0x1
#define COEX_REQUEST_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(10)
......@@ -147,6 +141,25 @@ enum coex_algorithm {
COEX_ALGO_MAX
};
enum coex_bt_profile {
BPM_NOPROFILE = 0,
BPM_HFP = BIT(0),
BPM_HID = BIT(1),
BPM_A2DP = BIT(2),
BPM_PAN = BIT(3),
BPM_HID_HFP = BPM_HID | BPM_HFP,
BPM_A2DP_HFP = BPM_A2DP | BPM_HFP,
BPM_A2DP_HID = BPM_A2DP | BPM_HID,
BPM_A2DP_HID_HFP = BPM_A2DP | BPM_HID | BPM_HFP,
BPM_PAN_HFP = BPM_PAN | BPM_HFP,
BPM_PAN_HID = BPM_PAN | BPM_HID,
BPM_PAN_HID_HFP = BPM_PAN | BPM_HID | BPM_HFP,
BPM_PAN_A2DP = BPM_PAN | BPM_A2DP,
BPM_PAN_A2DP_HFP = BPM_PAN | BPM_A2DP | BPM_HFP,
BPM_PAN_A2DP_HID = BPM_PAN | BPM_A2DP | BPM_HID,
BPM_PAN_A2DP_HID_HFP = BPM_PAN | BPM_A2DP | BPM_HID | BPM_HFP,
};
enum coex_wl_link_mode {
COEX_WLINK_2G1PORT = 0x0,
COEX_WLINK_5G = 0x3,
......
......@@ -1341,6 +1341,7 @@ static void rtw8822b_coex_cfg_wl_rx_gain(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool low_gain)
coex_dm->cur_wl_rx_low_gain_en = low_gain;
if (coex_dm->cur_wl_rx_low_gain_en) {
rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_COEX, "[BTCoex], Hi-Li Table On!\n");
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wl_rx_low_gain_on); i++)
rtw_write32(rtwdev, REG_RX_GAIN_EN, wl_rx_low_gain_on[i]);
......@@ -1350,6 +1351,7 @@ static void rtw8822b_coex_cfg_wl_rx_gain(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool low_gain)
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_B, RF_RCKD, 0x2, 0x1);
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_B, RF_RCK, 0x3f, 0x3f);
} else {
rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_COEX, "[BTCoex], Hi-Li Table Off!\n");
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wl_rx_low_gain_off); i++)
rtw_write32(rtwdev, 0x81c, wl_rx_low_gain_off[i]);
......
......@@ -2274,6 +2274,8 @@ static void rtw8822c_coex_cfg_wl_rx_gain(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool low_gain)
coex_dm->cur_wl_rx_low_gain_en = low_gain;
if (coex_dm->cur_wl_rx_low_gain_en) {
rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_COEX, "[BTCoex], Hi-Li Table On!\n");
/* set Rx filter corner RCK offset */
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RF_RCKD, RFREG_MASK, 0x22);
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RF_RCK, RFREG_MASK, 0x36);
......@@ -2281,6 +2283,8 @@ static void rtw8822c_coex_cfg_wl_rx_gain(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool low_gain)
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_B, RF_RCK, RFREG_MASK, 0x36);
} else {
rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_COEX, "[BTCoex], Hi-Li Table Off!\n");
/* set Rx filter corner RCK offset */
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RF_RCKD, RFREG_MASK, 0x20);
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RF_RCK, RFREG_MASK, 0x0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment