Commit 21b53baf authored by Colin Cross's avatar Colin Cross Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/rt: Fix SCHED_RR across cgroups

commit 454c7999 upstream.

task_tick_rt() has an optimization to only reschedule SCHED_RR tasks
if they were the only element on their rq.  However, with cgroups
a SCHED_RR task could be the only element on its per-cgroup rq but
still be competing with other SCHED_RR tasks in its parent's
cgroup.  In this case, the SCHED_RR task in the child cgroup would
never yield at the end of its timeslice.  If the child cgroup
rt_runtime_us was the same as the parent cgroup rt_runtime_us,
the task in the parent cgroup would starve completely.

Modify task_tick_rt() to check that the task is the only task on its
rq, and that the each of the scheduling entities of its ancestors
is also the only entity on its rq.
Signed-off-by: default avatarColin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337229266-15798-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent d5c20298
......@@ -1997,6 +1997,8 @@ static void watchdog(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
update_curr_rt(rq);
watchdog(rq, p);
......@@ -2014,12 +2016,15 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
p->rt.time_slice = RR_TIMESLICE;
/*
* Requeue to the end of queue if we are not the only element
* on the queue:
* Requeue to the end of queue if we (and all of our ancestors) are the
* only element on the queue
*/
if (p->rt.run_list.prev != p->rt.run_list.next) {
requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
if (rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next) {
requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
return;
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment