Commit 22ce2d94 authored by Ramalingam C's avatar Ramalingam C Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Implement HDCP2.2 link integrity check

Implements the link integrity check once in 500mSec.

Once encryption is enabled, an ongoing Link Integrity Check is
performed by the HDCP Receiver to check that cipher synchronization
is maintained between the HDCP Transmitter and the HDCP Receiver.

On the detection of synchronization lost, the HDCP Receiver must assert
the corresponding bits of the RxStatus register. The Transmitter polls
the RxStatus register and it may initiate re-authentication.

v2:
  Rebased.
v3:
  enum check_link_response is used check the link status [Uma]
v4:
  Rebased as part of patch reordering.
v5:
  Required members of intel_hdcp is defined [Sean Paul]
v6:
  hdcp2_check_link is cancelled at required places.
v7:
  Rebased for the component i/f changes.
  Errors due to the sinks are reported as DEBUG logs.
v8:
  hdcp_check_work is used for both hdcp1 and hdcp2 check_link [Daniel]
  hdcp2.2 encryption status check is put under WARN_ON [Daniel]
  drm_hdcp.h changes are moved into separate patch [Daniel]
v9:
  enum check_link_status is defined at intel_drv.h [Daniel]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarUma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1550338640-17470-11-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com
parent aeb0d80a
......@@ -324,6 +324,13 @@ struct intel_panel {
struct intel_digital_port;
enum check_link_response {
HDCP_LINK_PROTECTED = 0,
HDCP_TOPOLOGY_CHANGE,
HDCP_LINK_INTEGRITY_FAILURE,
HDCP_REAUTH_REQUEST
};
/*
* This structure serves as a translation layer between the generic HDCP code
* and the bus-specific code. What that means is that HDCP over HDMI differs
......@@ -419,6 +426,9 @@ struct intel_hdcp_shim {
*/
int (*config_stream_type)(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
bool is_repeater, u8 type);
/* HDCP2.2 Link Integrity Check */
int (*check_2_2_link)(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port);
};
struct intel_hdcp {
......
......@@ -111,6 +111,16 @@ static inline bool intel_hdcp_in_use(struct intel_connector *connector)
return reg & HDCP_STATUS_ENC;
}
static inline bool intel_hdcp2_in_use(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
enum port port = connector->encoder->port;
u32 reg;
reg = I915_READ(HDCP2_STATUS_DDI(port));
return reg & LINK_ENCRYPTION_STATUS;
}
static int intel_hdcp_poll_ksv_fifo(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim)
{
......@@ -1580,6 +1590,69 @@ static int _intel_hdcp2_disable(struct intel_connector *connector)
return ret;
}
/* Implements the Link Integrity Check for HDCP2.2 */
static int intel_hdcp2_check_link(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = conn_to_dig_port(connector);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
enum port port = connector->encoder->port;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&hdcp->mutex);
/* hdcp2_check_link is expected only when HDCP2.2 is Enabled */
if (hdcp->value != DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED ||
!hdcp->hdcp2_encrypted) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
if (WARN_ON(!intel_hdcp2_in_use(connector))) {
DRM_ERROR("HDCP2.2 link stopped the encryption, %x\n",
I915_READ(HDCP2_STATUS_DDI(port)));
ret = -ENXIO;
hdcp->value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED;
schedule_work(&hdcp->prop_work);
goto out;
}
ret = hdcp->shim->check_2_2_link(intel_dig_port);
if (ret == HDCP_LINK_PROTECTED) {
if (hdcp->value != DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED) {
hdcp->value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
schedule_work(&hdcp->prop_work);
}
goto out;
}
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[%s:%d] HDCP2.2 link failed, retrying auth\n",
connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id);
ret = _intel_hdcp2_disable(connector);
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("[%s:%d] Failed to disable hdcp2.2 (%d)\n",
connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id, ret);
hdcp->value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED;
schedule_work(&hdcp->prop_work);
goto out;
}
ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
if (ret) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[%s:%d] Failed to enable hdcp2.2 (%d)\n",
connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id,
ret);
hdcp->value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED;
schedule_work(&hdcp->prop_work);
goto out;
}
out:
mutex_unlock(&hdcp->mutex);
return ret;
}
static void intel_hdcp_check_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
......@@ -1587,7 +1660,10 @@ static void intel_hdcp_check_work(struct work_struct *work)
check_work);
struct intel_connector *connector = intel_hdcp_to_connector(hdcp);
if (!intel_hdcp_check_link(connector))
if (!intel_hdcp2_check_link(connector))
schedule_delayed_work(&hdcp->check_work,
DRM_HDCP2_CHECK_PERIOD_MS);
else if (!intel_hdcp_check_link(connector))
schedule_delayed_work(&hdcp->check_work,
DRM_HDCP_CHECK_PERIOD_MS);
}
......@@ -1721,6 +1797,7 @@ int intel_hdcp_init(struct intel_connector *connector,
int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
unsigned long check_link_interval = DRM_HDCP_CHECK_PERIOD_MS;
int ret = -EINVAL;
if (!hdcp->shim)
......@@ -1733,18 +1810,19 @@ int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector)
* Considering that HDCP2.2 is more secure than HDCP1.4, If the setup
* is capable of HDCP2.2, it is preferred to use HDCP2.2.
*/
if (intel_hdcp2_capable(connector))
if (intel_hdcp2_capable(connector)) {
ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
if (!ret)
check_link_interval = DRM_HDCP2_CHECK_PERIOD_MS;
}
/* When HDCP2.2 fails, HDCP1.4 will be attempted */
if (ret && intel_hdcp_capable(connector)) {
ret = _intel_hdcp_enable(connector);
if (!ret)
schedule_delayed_work(&hdcp->check_work,
DRM_HDCP_CHECK_PERIOD_MS);
}
if (!ret) {
schedule_delayed_work(&hdcp->check_work, check_link_interval);
hdcp->value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
schedule_work(&hdcp->prop_work);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment