Commit 2517b32b authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Stephen Boyd

clk: pxa: fix pxa2xx_determine_rate return

The new pxa2xx_determine_rate() function seems lacking in a few
regards:

- For an exact match or no match at all, the rate is uninitialized
  as reported by gcc -Wmaybe-unintialized:
   drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c: In function 'pxa2xx_determine_rate':
   drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c:243:5: error: 'rate' may be used uninitialized in this function

- If we get a non-exact match, the req->rate output is never set
  to the actual rate but remains at the requested rate.

- We should not attempt to print a rate if none could be found

This rewrites the logic accordingly.

Fixes: 9fe69429 ("clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq")
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: default avatarRobert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
parent 8c1ee96a
......@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ void pxa2xx_cpll_change(struct pxa2xx_freq *freq,
int pxa2xx_determine_rate(struct clk_rate_request *req,
struct pxa2xx_freq *freqs, int nb_freqs)
{
int i, closest_below = -1, closest_above = -1, ret = 0;
int i, closest_below = -1, closest_above = -1;
unsigned long rate;
for (i = 0; i < nb_freqs; i++) {
......@@ -230,18 +230,19 @@ int pxa2xx_determine_rate(struct clk_rate_request *req,
req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
if (i < nb_freqs)
ret = 0;
else if (closest_below >= 0)
if (i < nb_freqs) {
rate = req->rate;
} else if (closest_below >= 0) {
rate = freqs[closest_below].cpll;
else if (closest_above >= 0)
} else if (closest_above >= 0) {
rate = freqs[closest_above].cpll;
else
ret = -EINVAL;
} else {
pr_debug("%s(rate=%lu) no match\n", __func__, req->rate);
return -EINVAL;
}
pr_debug("%s(rate=%lu) rate=%lu: %d\n", __func__, req->rate, rate, ret);
if (!rate)
req->rate = rate;
pr_debug("%s(rate=%lu) rate=%lu\n", __func__, req->rate, rate);
req->rate = rate;
return ret;
return 0;
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment