Commit 27241dbf authored by Johannes Thumshirn's avatar Johannes Thumshirn Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

scsi: ses: use scsi_is_sas_rphy instead of is_sas_attached

commit 835831c5 upstream.

Use scsi_is_sas_rphy() instead of is_sas_attached() to decide whether we
should obtain the SAS address from a scsi device or not. This will
prevent us from tripping on the BUG_ON() in sas_sdev_to_rdev() if the
rphy isn't attached to the SAS transport class, like it is with hpsa's
logical devices.

Fixes: 3f8d6f2a ('ses: fix discovery of SATA devices in SAS enclosures')
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJames E.J. Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent c31d2667
......@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static void ses_match_to_enclosure(struct enclosure_device *edev,
ses_enclosure_data_process(edev, to_scsi_device(edev->edev.parent), 0);
if (is_sas_attached(sdev))
if (scsi_is_sas_rphy(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
efd.addr = sas_get_address(sdev);
if (efd.addr) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment