Commit 27c80efc authored by Neal Cardwell's avatar Neal Cardwell Committed by Jakub Kicinski

tcp: fix TFO SYN_RECV to not zero retrans_stamp with retransmits out

Fix tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen() to not zero retrans_stamp
if retransmits are outstanding.

tcp_fastopen_synack_timer() sets retrans_stamp, so typically we'll
need to zero retrans_stamp here to prevent spurious
retransmits_timed_out(). The logic to zero retrans_stamp is from this
2019 commit:

commit cd736d8b ("tcp: fix retrans timestamp on passive Fast Open")

However, in the corner case where the ACK of our TFO SYNACK carried
some SACK blocks that caused us to enter TCP_CA_Recovery then that
non-zero retrans_stamp corresponds to the active fast recovery, and we
need to leave retrans_stamp with its current non-zero value, for
correct ETIMEDOUT and undo behavior.

Fixes: cd736d8b ("tcp: fix retrans timestamp on passive Fast Open")
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001200517.2756803-4-ncardwell.sw@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent b41b4cbd
......@@ -6684,10 +6684,17 @@ static void tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen(struct sock *sk)
if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state == TCP_CA_Loss && !tp->packets_out)
tcp_try_undo_recovery(sk);
/* Reset rtx states to prevent spurious retransmits_timed_out() */
tcp_update_rto_time(tp);
tp->retrans_stamp = 0;
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits = 0;
/* In tcp_fastopen_synack_timer() on the first SYNACK RTO we set
* retrans_stamp but don't enter CA_Loss, so in case that happened we
* need to zero retrans_stamp here to prevent spurious
* retransmits_timed_out(). However, if the ACK of our SYNACK caused us
* to enter CA_Recovery then we need to leave retrans_stamp as it was
* set entering CA_Recovery, for correct retransmits_timed_out() and
* undo behavior.
*/
tcp_retrans_stamp_cleanup(sk);
/* Once we leave TCP_SYN_RECV or TCP_FIN_WAIT_1,
* we no longer need req so release it.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment