kconfig: fix documentation typos

Fix a couple typos in kconfig-language documentation.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst

@@ -591,7 +591,8 @@ The two different resolutions for b) can be tested in the sample Kconfig file
 Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02.
 
 Below is a list of examples of prior fixes for these types of recursive issues;
-all errors appear to involve one or more select's and one or more "depends on".
+all errors appear to involve one or more "select" statements and one or more
+"depends on".
 
 ============    ===================================
 commit          fix
@@ -653,7 +654,7 @@ the use of the xconfig configurator [1]_. Work should be done to confirm if
 the deduced semantics matches our intended Kconfig design goals.
 
 Having well defined semantics can be useful for tools for practical
-evaluation of depenencies, for instance one such use known case was work to
+evaluation of dependencies, for instance one such case was work to
 express in boolean abstraction of the inferred semantics of Kconfig to
 translate Kconfig logic into boolean formulas and run a SAT solver on this to
 find dead code / features (always inactive), 114 dead features were found in
@@ -680,7 +681,7 @@ abstraction the inferred semantics of Kconfig to translate Kconfig logic into
 boolean formulas and run a SAT solver on it [5]_. Another known related project
 is CADOS [6]_ (former VAMOS [7]_) and the tools, mainly undertaker [8]_, which
 has been introduced first with [9]_.  The basic concept of undertaker is to
-exract variability models from Kconfig, and put them together with a
+extract variability models from Kconfig and put them together with a
 propositional formula extracted from CPP #ifdefs and build-rules into a SAT
 solver in order to find dead code, dead files, and dead symbols. If using a SAT
 solver is desirable on Kconfig one approach would be to evaluate repurposing