Commit 2b8b7ed7 authored by Damien Le Moal's avatar Damien Le Moal Committed by Jens Axboe

null_blk: improve zone locking

With memory backing disabled, using a single spinlock for protecting
zone information and zone resource management prevents the parallel
execution on multiple queue of IO requests to different zones.
Furthermore, regardless of the use of memory backing, if a null_blk
device is created without limits on the number of open and active zones,
accounting for zone resource management is not necessary.

>From these observations, zone locking is changed as follows to improve
performance:
1) the zone_lock spinlock is renamed zone_res_lock and used only if
   zone resource management is necessary, that is, if either
   zone_max_open or zone_max_active are not 0. This is indicated using
   the new boolean need_zone_res_mgmt in the nullb_device structure.
   null_zone_write() is modified to reduce the amount of code executed
   with the zone_res_lock spinlock held.
2) With memory backing disabled, per zone locking is changed to a
   spinlock per zone.
3) Introduce the structure nullb_zone to replace the use of
   struct blk_zone for zone information. This new structure includes a
   union of a spinlock and a mutex for zone locking. The spinlock is
   used when memory backing is disabled and the mutex is used with
   memory backing.

With these changes, fio performance with zonemode=zbd for 4K random
read and random write on a dual socket (24 cores per socket) machine
using the none schedulder is as follows:

before patch:
	write (psync x 96 jobs) = 465 KIOPS
	read (libaio@qd=8 x 96 jobs) = 1361 KIOPS
after patch:
	write (psync x 96 jobs) = 456 KIOPS
	read (libaio@qd=8 x 96 jobs) = 4096 KIOPS

Write performance remains mostly unchanged but read performance is three
times higher. Performance when using the mq-deadline scheduler is not
changed by this patch as mq-deadline becomes the bottleneck for a
multi-queue device.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 817046ec
......@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
#include <linux/configfs.h>
#include <linux/badblocks.h>
#include <linux/fault-inject.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
struct nullb_cmd {
struct request *rq;
......@@ -32,6 +34,26 @@ struct nullb_queue {
struct nullb_cmd *cmds;
};
struct nullb_zone {
/*
* Zone lock to prevent concurrent modification of a zone write
* pointer position and condition: with memory backing, a write
* command execution may sleep on memory allocation. For this case,
* use mutex as the zone lock. Otherwise, use the spinlock for
* locking the zone.
*/
union {
spinlock_t spinlock;
struct mutex mutex;
};
enum blk_zone_type type;
enum blk_zone_cond cond;
sector_t start;
sector_t wp;
unsigned int len;
unsigned int capacity;
};
struct nullb_device {
struct nullb *nullb;
struct config_item item;
......@@ -45,10 +67,10 @@ struct nullb_device {
unsigned int nr_zones_imp_open;
unsigned int nr_zones_exp_open;
unsigned int nr_zones_closed;
struct blk_zone *zones;
struct nullb_zone *zones;
sector_t zone_size_sects;
spinlock_t zone_lock;
unsigned long *zone_locks;
bool need_zone_res_mgmt;
spinlock_t zone_res_lock;
unsigned long size; /* device size in MB */
unsigned long completion_nsec; /* time in ns to complete a request */
......
This diff is collapsed.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment