kprobes/x86: Fix kprobe-booster not to boost far call instructions

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764666

[ Upstream commit bd0b9067 ]

Fix the kprobe-booster not to boost far call instruction,
because a call may store the address in the single-step
execution buffer to the stack, which should be modified
after single stepping.

Currently, this instruction will be filtered as not
boostable in resume_execution(), so this is not a
critical issue.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/149076340615.22469.14066273186134229909.stgit@devboxSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger <juergh@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>

arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c

@@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ int can_boost(kprobe_opcode_t *opcodes, void *addr)
 		return (opcode != 0x62 && opcode != 0x67);
 	case 0x70:
 		return 0; /* can't boost conditional jump */
+	case 0x90:
+		return opcode != 0x9a;	/* can't boost call far */
 	case 0xc0:
 		/* can't boost software-interruptions */
 		return (0xc1 < opcode && opcode < 0xcc) || opcode == 0xcf;