Commit 2c338710 authored by Vladimir Oltean's avatar Vladimir Oltean Committed by Jakub Kicinski

net: enetc: rx_swbd and tx_swbd are never NULL in enetc_free_rxtx_rings()

The call path in enetc_close() is:

enetc_close()
-> enetc_free_rxtx_rings()
   -> enetc_free_rx_ring()
      -> tests whether rx_ring->rx_swbd is NULL
   -> enetc_free_tx_ring()
      -> tests whether tx_ring->tx_swbd is NULL
-> enetc_free_rx_resources()
   -> enetc_free_rxbdr()
      -> sets rxr->rx_swbd to NULL
-> enetc_free_tx_resources()
   -> enetc_free_txbdr()
      -> setx txr->tx_swbd to NULL

From the above, it is clear that due to the function ordering, the
checks for NULL are redundant, since the software buffer descriptor
arrays have not yet been set to NULL. Drop these checks.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 0d6cfd0f
......@@ -1880,9 +1880,6 @@ static void enetc_free_tx_ring(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring)
{
int i;
if (!tx_ring->tx_swbd)
return;
for (i = 0; i < tx_ring->bd_count; i++) {
struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
......@@ -1894,9 +1891,6 @@ static void enetc_free_rx_ring(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring)
{
int i;
if (!rx_ring->rx_swbd)
return;
for (i = 0; i < rx_ring->bd_count; i++) {
struct enetc_rx_swbd *rx_swbd = &rx_ring->rx_swbd[i];
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment