x86/PCI/ACPI: Make all resources except [io 0xcf8-0xcff] available on PCI bus
An IO port or MMIO resource assigned to a PCI host bridge may be consumed by the host bridge itself or available to its child bus/devices. The ACPI specification defines a bit (Producer/Consumer) to tell whether the resource is consumed by the host bridge itself, but firmware hasn't used that bit consistently, so we can't rely on it. Before commit 593669c2 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation"), arch/x86/pci/acpi.c ignored all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io and acpi_resource_fixed_io to filter out IO ports consumed by the host bridge itself. Commit 593669c2 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation") started accepting all IO port and MMIO resources, which caused a regression that IO port resources consumed by the host bridge itself became available to its child devices. Then commit 63f1789e ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself") ignored resources consumed by the host bridge itself by checking the IORESOURCE_WINDOW flag, which accidently removed MMIO resources defined by acpi_resource_memory24, acpi_resource_memory32 and acpi_resource_fixed_memory32. On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO port and MMIO resources are assumed to be available to child bus/devices except one special case: IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by the host bridge itself to access PCI configuration space. So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF]. This solution will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host bridge common code from x86, ia64 and ARM64. Related ACPI table are archived at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221 Related discussions at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461633/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/29/304 Fixes: 63f1789e (Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself) Reported-by: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment