Commit 2dc2063c authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Kamal Mostafa

vfs: Make sendfile(2) killable even better

commit c725bfce upstream.

Commit 296291cd (mm: make sendfile(2) killable) fixed an issue where
sendfile(2) was doing a lot of tiny writes into a filesystem and thus
was unkillable for a long time. However sendfile(2) can be (mis)used to
issue lots of writes into arbitrary file descriptor such as evenfd or
similar special file descriptors which never hit the standard filesystem
write path and thus are still unkillable. E.g. the following example
from Dmitry burns CPU for ~16s on my test system without possibility to
be killed:

        int r1 = eventfd(0, 0);
        int r2 = memfd_create("", 0);
        unsigned long n = 1<<30;
        fallocate(r2, 0, 0, n);
        sendfile(r1, r2, 0, n);

There are actually quite a few tests for pending signals in sendfile
code however we data to write is always available none of them seems to
trigger. So fix the problem by adding a test for pending signal into
splice_from_pipe_next() also before the loop waiting for pipe buffers to
be available. This should fix all the lockup issues with sendfile of the
do-ton-of-tiny-writes nature.
Reported-by: default avatarDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
parent eaea69ad
......@@ -871,6 +871,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(splice_from_pipe_feed);
*/
int splice_from_pipe_next(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct splice_desc *sd)
{
/*
* Check for signal early to make process killable when there are
* always buffers available
*/
if (signal_pending(current))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
while (!pipe->nrbufs) {
if (!pipe->writers)
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment