drm/i915/dmc: Do not try loading wrong DMC version
Checking by >= DISPLAY_VER(12) made sense when the support for Tiger Lake was added. However now it only leads to wrong behavior when adding more platforms since it's expected they either don't have DMC to load or they have their own blob. Logs from DG2 loading on a CFL host, without having a DMC firmware defined: <6>[ 0.000000] DMI: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client Platform/CoffeeLake S UDIMM RVP, BIOS CNLSFWR1.R00.X220.B00.2103302221 03/30/2021 ... <6>[ 2.706607] pci 0000:03:00.0: [8086:56a0] type 00 class 0x030000 ... <7>[ 6.340397] i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm:intel_dmc_ucode_init [i915]] Loading i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin <7>[ 6.341841] i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm:intel_fbc_init [i915]] Sanitized enable_fbc value: 1 <3>[ 6.342432] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 0. 00000080 (i915) vs. 00015a00 (timer) <6>[ 6.346283] i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin (v2.12) <3>[ 6.385756] i915 0000:03:00.0: Device initialization failed (-16) <5>[ 6.385778] i915 0000:03:00.0: Please file a bug on drm/i915; see https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs for details. <4>[ 6.385782] i915: probe of 0000:03:00.0 failed with error -16 TGL is the only platform left with DISPLAY_VER() == 12 that is not handled already in the if/else ladder, so handle it specifically. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223210933.3049143-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment