Commit 30b331d2 authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf lock: Allow concurrent record and report

To support live monitoring of kernel lock contention without BPF,
it should support something like below:

  # perf lock record -a -o- sleep 1 | perf lock contention -i-
   contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller

           2     10.27 us      6.17 us      5.13 us     spinlock   load_balance+0xc03
           1      5.29 us      5.29 us      5.29 us     rwlock:W   ep_scan_ready_list+0x54
           1      4.12 us      4.12 us      4.12 us     spinlock   smpboot_thread_fn+0x116
           1      3.28 us      3.28 us      3.28 us        mutex   pipe_read+0x50

To do that, it needs to handle HEAD_ATTR, HEADER_EVENT_UPDATE and
HEADER_TRACING_DATA which are generated only for the pipe mode.
And setting event handler also should be delayed until it gets the
event information.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarIan Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104051440.220989-1-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 6ac73820
......@@ -1390,6 +1390,34 @@ static int dump_info(void)
return rc;
}
static const struct evsel_str_handler lock_tracepoints[] = {
{ "lock:lock_acquire", evsel__process_lock_acquire, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
{ "lock:lock_acquired", evsel__process_lock_acquired, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP, CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
{ "lock:lock_contended", evsel__process_lock_contended, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP, CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
{ "lock:lock_release", evsel__process_lock_release, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
};
static const struct evsel_str_handler contention_tracepoints[] = {
{ "lock:contention_begin", evsel__process_contention_begin, },
{ "lock:contention_end", evsel__process_contention_end, },
};
static int process_event_update(struct perf_tool *tool,
union perf_event *event,
struct evlist **pevlist)
{
int ret;
ret = perf_event__process_event_update(tool, event, pevlist);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
/* this can return -EEXIST since we call it for each evsel */
perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, lock_tracepoints);
perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, contention_tracepoints);
return 0;
}
typedef int (*tracepoint_handler)(struct evsel *evsel,
struct perf_sample *sample);
......@@ -1545,28 +1573,19 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con)
print_bad_events(bad, total);
}
static const struct evsel_str_handler lock_tracepoints[] = {
{ "lock:lock_acquire", evsel__process_lock_acquire, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
{ "lock:lock_acquired", evsel__process_lock_acquired, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP, CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
{ "lock:lock_contended", evsel__process_lock_contended, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP, CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
{ "lock:lock_release", evsel__process_lock_release, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
};
static const struct evsel_str_handler contention_tracepoints[] = {
{ "lock:contention_begin", evsel__process_contention_begin, },
{ "lock:contention_end", evsel__process_contention_end, },
};
static bool force;
static int __cmd_report(bool display_info)
{
int err = -EINVAL;
struct perf_tool eops = {
.attr = perf_event__process_attr,
.event_update = process_event_update,
.sample = process_sample_event,
.comm = perf_event__process_comm,
.mmap = perf_event__process_mmap,
.namespaces = perf_event__process_namespaces,
.tracing_data = perf_event__process_tracing_data,
.ordered_events = true,
};
struct perf_data data = {
......@@ -1585,17 +1604,19 @@ static int __cmd_report(bool display_info)
symbol_conf.sort_by_name = true;
symbol__init(&session->header.env);
if (!perf_session__has_traces(session, "lock record"))
goto out_delete;
if (!data.is_pipe) {
if (!perf_session__has_traces(session, "lock record"))
goto out_delete;
if (perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, lock_tracepoints)) {
pr_err("Initializing perf session tracepoint handlers failed\n");
goto out_delete;
}
if (perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, lock_tracepoints)) {
pr_err("Initializing perf session tracepoint handlers failed\n");
goto out_delete;
}
if (perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, contention_tracepoints)) {
pr_err("Initializing perf session tracepoint handlers failed\n");
goto out_delete;
if (perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, contention_tracepoints)) {
pr_err("Initializing perf session tracepoint handlers failed\n");
goto out_delete;
}
}
if (setup_output_field(false, output_fields))
......@@ -1633,9 +1654,12 @@ static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv)
{
int err = -EINVAL;
struct perf_tool eops = {
.attr = perf_event__process_attr,
.event_update = process_event_update,
.sample = process_sample_event,
.comm = perf_event__process_comm,
.mmap = perf_event__process_mmap,
.tracing_data = perf_event__process_tracing_data,
.ordered_events = true,
};
struct perf_data data = {
......@@ -1698,7 +1722,7 @@ static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv)
pr_err("lock contention BPF setup failed\n");
goto out_delete;
}
} else {
} else if (!data.is_pipe) {
if (!perf_session__has_traces(session, "lock record"))
goto out_delete;
......
......@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ test_bpf()
if ! perf lock con -b true > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
echo "[Skip] No BPF support"
exit
return
fi
# the perf lock contention output goes to the stderr
......@@ -65,9 +65,22 @@ test_bpf()
fi
}
test_record_concurrent()
{
echo "Testing perf lock record and perf lock contention at the same time"
perf lock record -o- -- perf bench sched messaging 2> /dev/null | \
perf lock contention -i- -E 1 -q 2> ${result}
if [ $(cat "${result}" | wc -l) != "1" ]; then
echo "[Fail] Recorded result count is not 1:" $(cat "${result}" | wc -l)
err=1
exit
fi
}
check
test_record
test_bpf
test_record_concurrent
exit ${err}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment