Commit 30e72cb5 authored by Joe Thornber's avatar Joe Thornber Committed by Jiri Slaby

dm btree: add ref counting ops for the leaves of top level btrees

commit b0dc3c8b upstream.

When using nested btrees, the top leaves of the top levels contain
block addresses for the root of the next tree down.  If we shadow a
shared leaf node the leaf values (sub tree roots) should be incremented
accordingly.

This is only an issue if there is metadata sharing in the top levels.
Which only occurs if metadata snapshots are being used (as is possible
with dm-thinp).  And could result in a block from the thinp metadata
snap being reused early, thus corrupting the thinp metadata snap.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
parent 880af10d
......@@ -138,4 +138,10 @@ int lower_bound(struct btree_node *n, uint64_t key);
extern struct dm_block_validator btree_node_validator;
/*
* Value type for upper levels of multi-level btrees.
*/
extern void init_le64_type(struct dm_transaction_manager *tm,
struct dm_btree_value_type *vt);
#endif /* DM_BTREE_INTERNAL_H */
......@@ -544,14 +544,6 @@ static int remove_raw(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
return r;
}
static struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type = {
.context = NULL,
.size = sizeof(__le64),
.inc = NULL,
.dec = NULL,
.equal = NULL
};
int dm_btree_remove(struct dm_btree_info *info, dm_block_t root,
uint64_t *keys, dm_block_t *new_root)
{
......@@ -559,12 +551,14 @@ int dm_btree_remove(struct dm_btree_info *info, dm_block_t root,
int index = 0, r = 0;
struct shadow_spine spine;
struct btree_node *n;
struct dm_btree_value_type le64_vt;
init_le64_type(info->tm, &le64_vt);
init_shadow_spine(&spine, info);
for (level = 0; level < info->levels; level++) {
r = remove_raw(&spine, info,
(level == last_level ?
&info->value_type : &le64_type),
&info->value_type : &le64_vt),
root, keys[level], (unsigned *)&index);
if (r < 0)
break;
......
......@@ -249,3 +249,40 @@ int shadow_root(struct shadow_spine *s)
{
return s->root;
}
static void le64_inc(void *context, const void *value_le)
{
struct dm_transaction_manager *tm = context;
__le64 v_le;
memcpy(&v_le, value_le, sizeof(v_le));
dm_tm_inc(tm, le64_to_cpu(v_le));
}
static void le64_dec(void *context, const void *value_le)
{
struct dm_transaction_manager *tm = context;
__le64 v_le;
memcpy(&v_le, value_le, sizeof(v_le));
dm_tm_dec(tm, le64_to_cpu(v_le));
}
static int le64_equal(void *context, const void *value1_le, const void *value2_le)
{
__le64 v1_le, v2_le;
memcpy(&v1_le, value1_le, sizeof(v1_le));
memcpy(&v2_le, value2_le, sizeof(v2_le));
return v1_le == v2_le;
}
void init_le64_type(struct dm_transaction_manager *tm,
struct dm_btree_value_type *vt)
{
vt->context = tm;
vt->size = sizeof(__le64);
vt->inc = le64_inc;
vt->dec = le64_dec;
vt->equal = le64_equal;
}
......@@ -667,12 +667,7 @@ static int insert(struct dm_btree_info *info, dm_block_t root,
struct btree_node *n;
struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type;
le64_type.context = NULL;
le64_type.size = sizeof(__le64);
le64_type.inc = NULL;
le64_type.dec = NULL;
le64_type.equal = NULL;
init_le64_type(info->tm, &le64_type);
init_shadow_spine(&spine, info);
for (level = 0; level < (info->levels - 1); level++) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment