Commit 32047e2a authored by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki's avatar KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Committed by Linus Torvalds

memcg: avoid lock in updating file_mapped (Was fix race in file_mapped accouting flag management

At accounting file events per memory cgroup, we need to find memory cgroup
via page_cgroup->mem_cgroup.  Now, we use lock_page_cgroup() for guarantee
pc->mem_cgroup is not overwritten while we make use of it.

But, considering the context which page-cgroup for files are accessed,
we can use alternative light-weight mutual execusion in the most case.

At handling file-caches, the only race we have to take care of is "moving"
account, IOW, overwriting page_cgroup->mem_cgroup.  (See comment in the
patch)

Unlike charge/uncharge, "move" happens not so frequently. It happens only when
rmdir() and task-moving (with a special settings.)
This patch adds a race-checker for file-cache-status accounting v.s. account
moving. The new per-cpu-per-memcg counter MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE is added.
The routine for account move
  1. Increment it before start moving
  2. Call synchronize_rcu()
  3. Decrement it after the end of moving.
By this, file-status-counting routine can check it needs to call
lock_page_cgroup(). In most case, I doesn't need to call it.

Following is a perf data of a process which mmap()/munmap 32MB of file cache
in a minute.

Before patch:
    28.25%     mmap  mmap               [.] main
    22.64%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_fault
     9.96%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped
     3.67%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] filemap_fault
     3.50%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] unmap_vmas
     2.99%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __do_fault
     2.76%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] find_get_page

After patch:
    30.00%     mmap  mmap               [.] main
    23.78%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_fault
     5.52%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped
     3.81%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] unmap_vmas
     3.26%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] find_get_page
     3.18%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __do_fault
     3.03%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] filemap_fault
     2.40%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] handle_mm_fault
     2.40%     mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] do_page_fault

This patch reduces memcg's cost to some extent.
(mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped is called by both of map/unmap)

Note: It seems some more improvements are required..but no idea.
      maybe removing set/unset flag is required.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 0c270f8f
......@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ enum mem_cgroup_stat_index {
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT, /* # of pages paged out */
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT, /* # of pages, swapped out */
MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS, /* incremented at every pagein/pageout */
MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE, /* someone is moving account between groups */
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS,
};
......@@ -1051,7 +1052,46 @@ static unsigned int get_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return swappiness;
}
/* A routine for testing mem is not under move_account */
static void mem_cgroup_start_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
int cpu;
/* Because this is for moving account, reuse mc.lock */
spin_lock(&mc.lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
per_cpu(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE], cpu) += 1;
spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
synchronize_rcu();
}
static void mem_cgroup_end_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
int cpu;
if (!mem)
return;
spin_lock(&mc.lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
per_cpu(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE], cpu) -= 1;
spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
}
/*
* 2 routines for checking "mem" is under move_account() or not.
*
* mem_cgroup_stealed() - checking a cgroup is mc.from or not. This is used
* for avoiding race in accounting. If true,
* pc->mem_cgroup may be overwritten.
*
* mem_cgroup_under_move() - checking a cgroup is mc.from or mc.to or
* under hierarchy of moving cgroups. This is for
* waiting at hith-memory prressure caused by "move".
*/
static bool mem_cgroup_stealed(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
VM_BUG_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held());
return this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE]) > 0;
}
static bool mem_cgroup_under_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
......@@ -1462,35 +1502,62 @@ bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
/*
* Currently used to update mapped file statistics, but the routine can be
* generalized to update other statistics as well.
*
* Notes: Race condition
*
* We usually use page_cgroup_lock() for accessing page_cgroup member but
* it tends to be costly. But considering some conditions, we doesn't need
* to do so _always_.
*
* Considering "charge", lock_page_cgroup() is not required because all
* file-stat operations happen after a page is attached to radix-tree. There
* are no race with "charge".
*
* Considering "uncharge", we know that memcg doesn't clear pc->mem_cgroup
* at "uncharge" intentionally. So, we always see valid pc->mem_cgroup even
* if there are race with "uncharge". Statistics itself is properly handled
* by flags.
*
* Considering "move", this is an only case we see a race. To make the race
* small, we check MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE percpu value and detect there are
* possibility of race condition. If there is, we take a lock.
*/
void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page, int val)
{
struct mem_cgroup *mem;
struct page_cgroup *pc;
struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
bool need_unlock = false;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
if (unlikely(!pc))
return;
lock_page_cgroup(pc);
rcu_read_lock();
mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
if (!mem || !PageCgroupUsed(pc))
goto done;
/*
* Preemption is already disabled. We can use __this_cpu_xxx
*/
if (unlikely(!mem || !PageCgroupUsed(pc)))
goto out;
/* pc->mem_cgroup is unstable ? */
if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_stealed(mem))) {
/* take a lock against to access pc->mem_cgroup */
lock_page_cgroup(pc);
need_unlock = true;
mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
if (!mem || !PageCgroupUsed(pc))
goto out;
}
if (val > 0) {
__this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
SetPageCgroupFileMapped(pc);
} else {
__this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
if (!page_mapped(page)) /* for race between dec->inc counter */
ClearPageCgroupFileMapped(pc);
}
done:
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
out:
if (unlikely(need_unlock))
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
rcu_read_unlock();
return;
}
/*
......@@ -3039,6 +3106,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem, bool free_all)
lru_add_drain_all();
drain_all_stock_sync();
ret = 0;
mem_cgroup_start_move(mem);
for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
for (zid = 0; !ret && zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
enum lru_list l;
......@@ -3052,6 +3120,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem, bool free_all)
if (ret)
break;
}
mem_cgroup_end_move(mem);
memcg_oom_recover(mem);
/* it seems parent cgroup doesn't have enough mem */
if (ret == -ENOMEM)
......@@ -4514,6 +4583,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
mc.to = NULL;
mc.moving_task = NULL;
spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
mem_cgroup_end_move(from);
memcg_oom_recover(from);
memcg_oom_recover(to);
wake_up_all(&mc.waitq);
......@@ -4544,6 +4614,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
VM_BUG_ON(mc.moved_charge);
VM_BUG_ON(mc.moved_swap);
VM_BUG_ON(mc.moving_task);
mem_cgroup_start_move(from);
spin_lock(&mc.lock);
mc.from = from;
mc.to = mem;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment