Commit 3238e215 authored by Dave Kleikamp's avatar Dave Kleikamp

JFS: detect and fix invalid directory index values

The directory index values are the unique cookies used to resume
a readdir at the proper place.  These are stored with each entry
in a directory.  fsck.jfs does not currently validate these entries,
nor even create them when populating the lost+found directory.

This patch causes readdir to detect the invalid cookies, and generate
new ones, if possible.
parent b920ee56
......@@ -2830,6 +2830,67 @@ void dtInitRoot(tid_t tid, struct inode *ip, u32 idotdot)
return;
}
/*
* add_missing_indices()
*
* function: Fix dtree page in which one or more entries has an invalid index.
* fsck.jfs should really fix this, but it currently does not.
* Called from jfs_readdir when bad index is detected.
*/
static void add_missing_indices(struct inode *inode, s64 bn)
{
struct ldtentry *d;
struct dt_lock *dtlck;
int i;
uint index;
struct lv *lv;
struct metapage *mp;
dtpage_t *p;
int rc;
s8 *stbl;
tid_t tid;
struct tlock *tlck;
tid = txBegin(inode->i_sb, 0);
DT_GETPAGE(inode, bn, mp, PSIZE, p, rc);
if (rc) {
printk(KERN_ERR "DT_GETPAGE failed!\n");
goto end;
}
BT_MARK_DIRTY(mp, inode);
ASSERT(p->header.flag & BT_LEAF);
tlck = txLock(tid, inode, mp, tlckDTREE | tlckENTRY);
dtlck = (struct dt_lock *) &tlck->lock;
stbl = DT_GETSTBL(p);
for (i = 0; i < p->header.nextindex; i++) {
d = (struct ldtentry *) &p->slot[stbl[i]];
index = le32_to_cpu(d->index);
if ((index < 2) || (index >= JFS_IP(inode)->next_index)) {
d->index = cpu_to_le32(add_index(tid, inode, bn, i));
if (dtlck->index >= dtlck->maxcnt)
dtlck = (struct dt_lock *) txLinelock(dtlck);
lv = dtlck->lv;
lv->offset = stbl[i];
lv->length = 1;
dtlck->index++;
}
}
DT_PUTPAGE(mp);
(void) txCommit(tid, 1, &inode, 0);
end:
txEnd(tid);
}
/*
* Buffer to hold directory entry info while traversing a dtree page
* before being fed to the filldir function
*/
struct jfs_dirent {
loff_t position;
int ino;
......@@ -2837,6 +2898,9 @@ struct jfs_dirent {
char name[0];
};
/*
* function to determine next variable-sized jfs_dirent in buffer
*/
inline struct jfs_dirent *next_jfs_dirent(struct jfs_dirent *dirent)
{
return (struct jfs_dirent *)
......@@ -2886,7 +2950,8 @@ int jfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
uint loop_count = 0;
struct jfs_dirent *jfs_dirent;
int jfs_dirents;
int overflow;
int overflow, fix_page, page_fixed = 0;
static int unique_pos = 2; /* If we can't fix broken index */
if (filp->f_pos == DIREND)
return 0;
......@@ -3046,7 +3111,7 @@ int jfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
while (1) {
jfs_dirent = (struct jfs_dirent *) dirent_buf;
jfs_dirents = 0;
overflow = 0;
overflow = fix_page = 0;
stbl = DT_GETSTBL(p);
......@@ -3066,8 +3131,32 @@ int jfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
jfs_dirent->ino = le32_to_cpu(d->inumber);
if (do_index) {
jfs_dirent->position = le32_to_cpu(d->index);
len = min(d_namleft, DTLHDRDATALEN);
jfs_dirent->position = le32_to_cpu(d->index);
/*
* d->index should always be valid, but it
* isn't. fsck.jfs doesn't create the
* directory index for the lost+found
* directory. Rather than let it go,
* we can try to fix it.
*/
if ((jfs_dirent->position < 2) ||
(jfs_dirent->position >=
JFS_IP(ip)->next_index)) {
if (!page_fixed && !isReadOnly(ip)) {
fix_page = 1;
/*
* setting overflow and setting
* index to i will cause the
* same page to be processed
* again starting here
*/
overflow = 1;
index = i;
break;
}
jfs_dirent->position = unique_pos++;
}
} else {
jfs_dirent->position = dtpos;
len = min(d_namleft, DTLHDRDATALEN_LEGACY);
......@@ -3120,6 +3209,7 @@ int jfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
dtoffset->index = 0;
}
}
page_fixed = 0;
}
/* unpin previous leaf page */
......@@ -3135,6 +3225,11 @@ int jfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
jfs_dirent = next_jfs_dirent(jfs_dirent);
}
if (fix_page) {
add_missing_indices(ip, bn);
page_fixed = 1;
}
if (!overflow && (bn == 0)) {
filp->f_pos = DIREND;
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment