[SCSI] libsas: don't use made up error codes
This is bad for two reasons: 1. If they're returned to outside applications, no-one knows what they mean. 2. Eventually they'll clash with the ever expanding standard error codes. The problem error code in question is ETASK. I've replaced this by ECOMM (communications error on send) a network error code that seems to most closely relay what ETASK meant. Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment