Commit 33ddd841 authored by Niu Yawei's avatar Niu Yawei Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

staging: lustre: obdclass: serialize lu_site purge

Umount process relies on lu_site_purge(-1) to purge all
objects before umount, however, if there happen to have a
cache shrinker which calls lu_site_purge(nr) in parallel,
some objects may still being freed by cache shrinker even
after the lu_site_purge(-1) called by umount done.

This can be simply fixed by serializing purge threads,
since it doesn't make any sense to have them in parallel.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNiu Yawei <yawei.niu@intel.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5331
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/11099Reviewed-by: default avatarLai Siyao <lai.siyao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMike Pershin <mike.pershin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 638814f6
......@@ -622,6 +622,11 @@ struct lu_site {
struct list_head ls_ld_linkage;
spinlock_t ls_ld_lock;
/**
* Lock to serialize site purge.
*/
struct mutex ls_purge_mutex;
/**
* lu_site stats
*/
......
......@@ -354,6 +354,11 @@ int lu_site_purge(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_site *s, int nr)
start = s->ls_purge_start;
bnr = (nr == ~0) ? -1 : nr / CFS_HASH_NBKT(s->ls_obj_hash) + 1;
again:
/*
* It doesn't make any sense to make purge threads parallel, that can
* only bring troubles to us. See LU-5331.
*/
mutex_lock(&s->ls_purge_mutex);
did_sth = 0;
cfs_hash_for_each_bucket(s->ls_obj_hash, &bd, i) {
if (i < start)
......@@ -399,6 +404,7 @@ int lu_site_purge(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_site *s, int nr)
if (nr == 0)
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&s->ls_purge_mutex);
if (nr != 0 && did_sth && start != 0) {
start = 0; /* restart from the first bucket */
......@@ -983,6 +989,7 @@ int lu_site_init(struct lu_site *s, struct lu_device *top)
char name[16];
memset(s, 0, sizeof(*s));
mutex_init(&s->ls_purge_mutex);
snprintf(name, 16, "lu_site_%s", top->ld_type->ldt_name);
for (bits = lu_htable_order(top); bits >= LU_SITE_BITS_MIN; bits--) {
s->ls_obj_hash = cfs_hash_create(name, bits, bits,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment