Commit 3445139e authored by Song Liu's avatar Song Liu

Revert "Revert "md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d""

This reverts commit bed9e27b.

The original set [1][2] was expected to undo a suboptimal fix in [2], and
replace it with a better fix [1]. However, as reported by Dan Moulding [2]
causes an issue with raid5 with journal device.

Revert [2] for now to close the issue. We will follow up on another issue
reported by Juxiao Bi, as [2] is expected to fix it. We believe this is a
good trade-off, because the latter issue happens less freqently.

In the meanwhile, we will NOT revert [1], as it contains the right logic.

[1] commit d6e035aa ("md: bypass block throttle for superblock update")
[2] commit bed9e27b ("Revert "md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d"")
Reported-by: default avatarDan Moulding <dan@danm.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20240123005700.9302-1-dan@danm.net/
Fixes: bed9e27b ("Revert "md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d"")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.19+
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSong Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125082131.788600-1-song@kernel.org
parent 26828324
......@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/raid/pq.h>
#include <linux/async_tx.h>
......@@ -6764,7 +6765,18 @@ static void raid5d(struct md_thread *thread)
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
md_check_recovery(mddev);
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
/*
* Waiting on MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING below may deadlock
* seeing md_check_recovery() is needed to clear
* the flag when using mdmon.
*/
continue;
}
wait_event_lock_irq(mddev->sb_wait,
!test_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->sb_flags),
conf->device_lock);
}
pr_debug("%d stripes handled\n", handled);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment