Commit 34982fe1 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Rename ilk_wm_max to ilk_compute_wm_maximums

Makes the intention more clear.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 1996d624
......@@ -2371,11 +2371,11 @@ static unsigned int ilk_fbc_wm_max(void)
return 15;
}
static void ilk_wm_max(struct drm_device *dev,
int level,
const struct intel_wm_config *config,
enum intel_ddb_partitioning ddb_partitioning,
struct hsw_wm_maximums *max)
static void ilk_compute_wm_maximums(struct drm_device *dev,
int level,
const struct intel_wm_config *config,
enum intel_ddb_partitioning ddb_partitioning,
struct hsw_wm_maximums *max)
{
max->pri = ilk_plane_wm_max(dev, level, config, ddb_partitioning, false);
max->spr = ilk_plane_wm_max(dev, level, config, ddb_partitioning, true);
......@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ static bool intel_compute_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
struct hsw_wm_maximums max;
/* LP0 watermarks always use 1/2 DDB partitioning */
ilk_wm_max(dev, 0, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
ilk_compute_wm_maximums(dev, 0, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++)
ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, level, params,
......@@ -2927,12 +2927,12 @@ static void haswell_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
intel_crtc->wm.active = pipe_wm;
ilk_wm_max(dev, 1, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
ilk_compute_wm_maximums(dev, 1, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
ilk_wm_merge(dev, &max, &lp_wm_1_2);
/* 5/6 split only in single pipe config on IVB+ */
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 7 && config.num_pipes_active == 1) {
ilk_wm_max(dev, 1, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_5_6, &max);
ilk_compute_wm_maximums(dev, 1, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_5_6, &max);
ilk_wm_merge(dev, &max, &lp_wm_5_6);
best_lp_wm = hsw_find_best_result(dev, &lp_wm_1_2, &lp_wm_5_6);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment