Commit 36f9f209 authored by Andrew Morton's avatar Andrew Morton Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] Allow i386 to reenable interrupts on lock contention

From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>

Following up on Keith's code, I adapted the i386 code to allow enabling
interrupts during contested locks depending on previous interrupt
enable status. Obviously there will be a text increase (only for non
CONFIG_SPINLINE case), although it doesn't seem so bad, there will be an
increased exit latency when we attempt a lock acquisition after spinning
due to the extra instructions. How much this will affect performance I'm
not sure yet as I haven't had time to micro bench.

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
2628024  921731       0 3549755  362a3b vmlinux-after
2621369  921731       0 3543100  36103c vmlinux-before
2618313  919222       0 3537535  35fa7f vmlinux-spinline

The code has been stress tested on a 16x NUMAQ (courtesy OSDL).
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 5e1c40de
...@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ typedef struct { ...@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ typedef struct {
#define spin_is_locked(x) (*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->lock) <= 0) #define spin_is_locked(x) (*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->lock) <= 0)
#define spin_unlock_wait(x) do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x)) #define spin_unlock_wait(x) do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x))
#define _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) _raw_spin_lock(lock)
#define spin_lock_string \ #define spin_lock_string \
"\n1:\t" \ "\n1:\t" \
...@@ -56,6 +55,23 @@ typedef struct { ...@@ -56,6 +55,23 @@ typedef struct {
"jmp 1b\n" \ "jmp 1b\n" \
LOCK_SECTION_END LOCK_SECTION_END
#define spin_lock_string_flags \
"\n1:\t" \
"lock ; decb %0\n\t" \
"js 2f\n\t" \
LOCK_SECTION_START("") \
"2:\t" \
"testl $0x200, %1\n\t" \
"jz 3f\n\t" \
"sti\n\t" \
"3:\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"cmpb $0, %0\n\t" \
"jle 3b\n\t" \
"cli\n\t" \
"jmp 1b\n" \
LOCK_SECTION_END
/* /*
* This works. Despite all the confusion. * This works. Despite all the confusion.
* (except on PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE) * (except on PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE)
...@@ -126,6 +142,20 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock) ...@@ -126,6 +142,20 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
:"=m" (lock->lock) : : "memory"); :"=m" (lock->lock) : : "memory");
} }
static inline void _raw_spin_lock_flags (spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
__label__ here;
here:
if (unlikely(lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC)) {
printk("eip: %p\n", &&here);
BUG();
}
#endif
__asm__ __volatile__(
spin_lock_string_flags
:"=m" (lock->lock) : "r" (flags) : "memory");
}
/* /*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment