btrfs: handle preemptive delalloc flushing slightly differently
If we decide to flush delalloc from the preemptive flusher, we really do not want to wait on ordered extents, as it gains us nothing. However there was logic to go ahead and wait on ordered extents if there was more ordered bytes than delalloc bytes. We do not want this behavior, so pass through whether this flushing is for preemption, and do not wait for ordered extents if that's the case. Also break out of the shrink loop after the first flushing, as we just want to one shot shrink delalloc. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment