Commit 389955fd authored by Dave Jones's avatar Dave Jones Committed by Chris Wright

[PATCH] CPUFREQ: Correct revision mask for powernow-k8

Mark Langsdorf points out that the correct define for this
revision bump is 0x80000.  Also to save us having to keep
renaming the #define, give it a more meaningful name.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
parent d1e08ea7
......@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int check_supported_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
if ((eax & CPUID_XFAM) == CPUID_XFAM_K8) {
if (((eax & CPUID_USE_XFAM_XMOD) != CPUID_USE_XFAM_XMOD) ||
((eax & CPUID_XMOD) > CPUID_XMOD_REV_H)) {
((eax & CPUID_XMOD) > CPUID_XMOD_REV_MASK)) {
printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Processor cpuid %x not supported\n", eax);
goto out;
}
......
......@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct powernow_k8_data {
#define CPUID_XFAM 0x0ff00000 /* extended family */
#define CPUID_XFAM_K8 0
#define CPUID_XMOD 0x000f0000 /* extended model */
#define CPUID_XMOD_REV_H 0x00070000
#define CPUID_XMOD_REV_MASK 0x00080000
#define CPUID_XFAM_10H 0x00100000 /* family 0x10 */
#define CPUID_USE_XFAM_XMOD 0x00000f00
#define CPUID_GET_MAX_CAPABILITIES 0x80000000
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment