Commit 3b27de27 authored by Paolo Bonzini's avatar Paolo Bonzini

KVM: x86: split the two parts of emulator_pio_in

emulator_pio_in handles both the case where the data is pending in
vcpu->arch.pio.count, and the case where I/O has to be done via either
an in-kernel device or a userspace exit.  For SEV-ES we would like
to split these, to identify clearly the moment at which the
sev_pio_data is consumed.  To this end, create two different
functions: __emulator_pio_in fills in vcpu->arch.pio.count, while
complete_emulator_pio_in clears it and releases vcpu->arch.pio.data.

Because this patch has to be backported, things are left a bit messy.
kernel_pio() operates on vcpu->arch.pio, which leads to emulator_pio_in()
having with two calls to complete_emulator_pio_in().  It will be fixed
in the next release.

While at it, remove the unused void* val argument of emulator_pio_in_out.
The function currently hardcodes vcpu->arch.pio_data as the
source/destination buffer, which sucks but will be fixed after the more
severe SEV-ES buffer overflow.

No functional change intended.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7ed9abfe ("KVM: SVM: Support string IO operations for an SEV-ES guest")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent ea724ea4
......@@ -6906,7 +6906,7 @@ static int kernel_pio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *pd)
}
static int emulator_pio_in_out(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
unsigned short port, void *val,
unsigned short port,
unsigned int count, bool in)
{
vcpu->arch.pio.port = port;
......@@ -6927,26 +6927,38 @@ static int emulator_pio_in_out(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
return 0;
}
static int emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
unsigned short port, void *val, unsigned int count)
static int __emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
unsigned short port, unsigned int count)
{
int ret;
WARN_ON(vcpu->arch.pio.count);
memset(vcpu->arch.pio_data, 0, size * count);
return emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, count, true);
}
if (vcpu->arch.pio.count)
goto data_avail;
static void complete_emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
unsigned short port, void *val)
{
memcpy(val, vcpu->arch.pio_data, size * vcpu->arch.pio.count);
trace_kvm_pio(KVM_PIO_IN, port, size, vcpu->arch.pio.count, vcpu->arch.pio_data);
vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
}
memset(vcpu->arch.pio_data, 0, size * count);
static int emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
unsigned short port, void *val, unsigned int count)
{
if (vcpu->arch.pio.count) {
/* Complete previous iteration. */
} else {
int r = __emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, count);
if (!r)
return r;
ret = emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, val, count, true);
if (ret) {
data_avail:
memcpy(val, vcpu->arch.pio_data, size * count);
trace_kvm_pio(KVM_PIO_IN, port, size, count, vcpu->arch.pio_data);
vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
return 1;
/* Results already available, fall through. */
}
return 0;
WARN_ON(count != vcpu->arch.pio.count);
complete_emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, val);
return 1;
}
static int emulator_pio_in_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
......@@ -6965,12 +6977,11 @@ static int emulator_pio_out(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
memcpy(vcpu->arch.pio_data, val, size * count);
trace_kvm_pio(KVM_PIO_OUT, port, size, count, vcpu->arch.pio_data);
ret = emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, (void *)val, count, false);
ret = emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, count, false);
if (ret)
vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
return ret;
}
static int emulator_pio_out_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment