Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2021-08-12' of...

Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2021-08-12' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-fixes

- GVT fix for Windows VM hang.
- Display fix of 12 BPC bits for display 12 and newer.
- Don't try to access some media register for fused off domains.
- Fix kerneldoc build warnings.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YRU/hnQ1sNr+j37x@intel.com

Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.rst

@@ -18,114 +18,5 @@ real, with all the uAPI bits is:
         * Route shmem backend over to TTM SYSTEM for discrete
         * TTM purgeable object support
         * Move i915 buddy allocator over to TTM
-        * MMAP ioctl mode(see `I915 MMAP`_)
-        * SET/GET ioctl caching(see `I915 SET/GET CACHING`_)
 * Send RFC(with mesa-dev on cc) for final sign off on the uAPI
 * Add pciid for DG1 and turn on uAPI for real
-
-New object placement and region query uAPI
-==========================================
-Starting from DG1 we need to give userspace the ability to allocate buffers from
-device local-memory. Currently the driver supports gem_create, which can place
-buffers in system memory via shmem, and the usual assortment of other
-interfaces, like dumb buffers and userptr.
-
-To support this new capability, while also providing a uAPI which will work
-beyond just DG1, we propose to offer three new bits of uAPI:
-
-DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS
------------------------------
-New query ID which allows userspace to discover the list of supported memory
-regions(like system-memory and local-memory) for a given device. We identify
-each region with a class and instance pair, which should be unique. The class
-here would be DEVICE or SYSTEM, and the instance would be zero, on platforms
-like DG1.
-
-Side note: The class/instance design is borrowed from our existing engine uAPI,
-where we describe every physical engine in terms of its class, and the
-particular instance, since we can have more than one per class.
-
-In the future we also want to expose more information which can further
-describe the capabilities of a region.
-
-.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
-        :functions: drm_i915_gem_memory_class drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance drm_i915_memory_region_info drm_i915_query_memory_regions
-
-GEM_CREATE_EXT
---------------
-New ioctl which is basically just gem_create but now allows userspace to provide
-a chain of possible extensions. Note that if we don't provide any extensions and
-set flags=0 then we get the exact same behaviour as gem_create.
-
-Side note: We also need to support PXP[1] in the near future, which is also
-applicable to integrated platforms, and adds its own gem_create_ext extension,
-which basically lets userspace mark a buffer as "protected".
-
-.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
-        :functions: drm_i915_gem_create_ext
-
-I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS
-----------------------------------
-Implemented as an extension for gem_create_ext, we would now allow userspace to
-optionally provide an immutable list of preferred placements at creation time,
-in priority order, for a given buffer object.  For the placements we expect
-them each to use the class/instance encoding, as per the output of the regions
-query. Having the list in priority order will be useful in the future when
-placing an object, say during eviction.
-
-.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
-        :functions: drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions
-
-One fair criticism here is that this seems a little over-engineered[2]. If we
-just consider DG1 then yes, a simple gem_create.flags or something is totally
-all that's needed to tell the kernel to allocate the buffer in local-memory or
-whatever. However looking to the future we need uAPI which can also support
-upcoming Xe HP multi-tile architecture in a sane way, where there can be
-multiple local-memory instances for a given device, and so using both class and
-instance in our uAPI to describe regions is desirable, although specifically
-for DG1 it's uninteresting, since we only have a single local-memory instance.
-
-Existing uAPI issues
-====================
-Some potential issues we still need to resolve.
-
-I915 MMAP
----------
-In i915 there are multiple ways to MMAP GEM object, including mapping the same
-object using different mapping types(WC vs WB), i.e multiple active mmaps per
-object. TTM expects one MMAP at most for the lifetime of the object. If it
-turns out that we have to backpedal here, there might be some potential
-userspace fallout.
-
-I915 SET/GET CACHING
---------------------
-In i915 we have set/get_caching ioctl. TTM doesn't let us to change this, but
-DG1 doesn't support non-snooped pcie transactions, so we can just always
-allocate as WB for smem-only buffers.  If/when our hw gains support for
-non-snooped pcie transactions then we must fix this mode at allocation time as
-a new GEM extension.
-
-This is related to the mmap problem, because in general (meaning, when we're
-not running on intel cpus) the cpu mmap must not, ever, be inconsistent with
-allocation mode.
-
-Possible idea is to let the kernel picks the mmap mode for userspace from the
-following table:
-
-smem-only: WB. Userspace does not need to call clflush.
-
-smem+lmem: We only ever allow a single mode, so simply allocate this as uncached
-memory, and always give userspace a WC mapping. GPU still does snooped access
-here(assuming we can't turn it off like on DG1), which is a bit inefficient.
-
-lmem only: always WC
-
-This means on discrete you only get a single mmap mode, all others must be
-rejected. That's probably going to be a new default mode or something like
-that.
-
-Links
-=====
-[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86798/
-
-[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5599#note_553791

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c

@@ -5746,16 +5746,18 @@ static void bdw_set_pipemisc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 
 	switch (crtc_state->pipe_bpp) {
 	case 18:
-		val |= PIPEMISC_DITHER_6_BPC;
+		val |= PIPEMISC_6_BPC;
 		break;
 	case 24:
-		val |= PIPEMISC_DITHER_8_BPC;
+		val |= PIPEMISC_8_BPC;
 		break;
 	case 30:
-		val |= PIPEMISC_DITHER_10_BPC;
+		val |= PIPEMISC_10_BPC;
 		break;
 	case 36:
-		val |= PIPEMISC_DITHER_12_BPC;
+		/* Port output 12BPC defined for ADLP+ */
+		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 12)
+			val |= PIPEMISC_12_BPC_ADLP;
 		break;
 	default:
 		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->pipe_bpp);
@@ -5808,15 +5810,27 @@ int bdw_get_pipemisc_bpp(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 
 	tmp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PIPEMISC(crtc->pipe));
 
-	switch (tmp & PIPEMISC_DITHER_BPC_MASK) {
-	case PIPEMISC_DITHER_6_BPC:
+	switch (tmp & PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK) {
+	case PIPEMISC_6_BPC:
 		return 18;
-	case PIPEMISC_DITHER_8_BPC:
+	case PIPEMISC_8_BPC:
 		return 24;
-	case PIPEMISC_DITHER_10_BPC:
+	case PIPEMISC_10_BPC:
 		return 30;
-	case PIPEMISC_DITHER_12_BPC:
-		return 36;
+	/*
+	 * PORT OUTPUT 12 BPC defined for ADLP+.
+	 *
+	 * TODO:
+	 * For previous platforms with DSI interface, bits 5:7
+	 * are used for storing pipe_bpp irrespective of dithering.
+	 * Since the value of 12 BPC is not defined for these bits
+	 * on older platforms, need to find a workaround for 12 BPC
+	 * MIPI DSI HW readout.
+	 */
+	case PIPEMISC_12_BPC_ADLP:
+		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 12)
+			return 36;
+		fallthrough;
 	default:
 		MISSING_CASE(tmp);
 		return 0;

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c

@@ -3149,6 +3149,7 @@ static int init_bdw_mmio_info(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
 	MMIO_DFH(_MMIO(0xb100), D_BDW, F_CMD_ACCESS, NULL, NULL);
 	MMIO_DFH(_MMIO(0xb10c), D_BDW, F_CMD_ACCESS, NULL, NULL);
 	MMIO_D(_MMIO(0xb110), D_BDW);
+	MMIO_D(GEN9_SCRATCH_LNCF1, D_BDW_PLUS);
 
 	MMIO_F(_MMIO(0x24d0), 48, F_CMD_ACCESS | F_CMD_WRITE_PATCH, 0, 0,
 		D_BDW_PLUS, NULL, force_nonpriv_write);

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio_context.c

@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ static struct engine_mmio gen9_engine_mmio_list[] __cacheline_aligned = {
 	{RCS0, COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN2, 0xffff, true}, /* 0x7014 */
 	{RCS0, GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1, 0xffff, false}, /* 0x20ec */
 	{RCS0, GEN8_L3SQCREG4, 0, false}, /* 0xb118 */
+	{RCS0, GEN9_SCRATCH1, 0, false}, /* 0xb11c */
+	{RCS0, GEN9_SCRATCH_LNCF1, 0, false}, /* 0xb008 */
 	{RCS0, GEN7_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1, 0xffff, true}, /* 0xe100 */
 	{RCS0, HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN2, 0xffff, true}, /* 0xe180 */
 	{RCS0, HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN3, 0xffff, true}, /* 0xe184 */

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c

@@ -727,9 +727,18 @@ static void err_print_gt(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER(m->i915) >= 12) {
 		int i;
 
-		for (i = 0; i < GEN12_SFC_DONE_MAX; i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < GEN12_SFC_DONE_MAX; i++) {
+			/*
+			 * SFC_DONE resides in the VD forcewake domain, so it
+			 * only exists if the corresponding VCS engine is
+			 * present.
+			 */
+			if (!HAS_ENGINE(gt->_gt, _VCS(i * 2)))
+				continue;
+
 			err_printf(m, "  SFC_DONE[%d]: 0x%08x\n", i,
 				   gt->sfc_done[i]);
+		}
 
 		err_printf(m, "  GAM_DONE: 0x%08x\n", gt->gam_done);
 	}
@@ -1581,6 +1590,14 @@ static void gt_record_regs(struct intel_gt_coredump *gt)
 
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
 		for (i = 0; i < GEN12_SFC_DONE_MAX; i++) {
+			/*
+			 * SFC_DONE resides in the VD forcewake domain, so it
+			 * only exists if the corresponding VCS engine is
+			 * present.
+			 */
+			if (!HAS_ENGINE(gt->_gt, _VCS(i * 2)))
+				continue;
+
 			gt->sfc_done[i] =
 				intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN12_SFC_DONE(i));
 		}

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

@@ -6163,11 +6163,17 @@ enum {
 #define   PIPEMISC_HDR_MODE_PRECISION	(1 << 23) /* icl+ */
 #define   PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_COLORSPACE_YUV  (1 << 11)
 #define   PIPEMISC_PIXEL_ROUNDING_TRUNC	REG_BIT(8) /* tgl+ */
-#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_BPC_MASK	(7 << 5)
-#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_8_BPC		(0 << 5)
-#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_10_BPC	(1 << 5)
-#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_6_BPC		(2 << 5)
-#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_12_BPC	(3 << 5)
+/*
+ * For Display < 13, Bits 5-7 of PIPE MISC represent DITHER BPC with
+ * valid values of: 6, 8, 10 BPC.
+ * ADLP+, the bits 5-7 represent PORT OUTPUT BPC with valid values of:
+ * 6, 8, 10, 12 BPC.
+ */
+#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK		(7 << 5)
+#define   PIPEMISC_8_BPC		(0 << 5)
+#define   PIPEMISC_10_BPC		(1 << 5)
+#define   PIPEMISC_6_BPC		(2 << 5)
+#define   PIPEMISC_12_BPC_ADLP		(4 << 5) /* adlp+ */
 #define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_ENABLE	(1 << 4)
 #define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK	(3 << 2)
 #define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_SP	(0 << 2)