Commit 3ef0296a authored by David Vrabel's avatar David Vrabel Committed by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

xen/events: document behaviour when scanning the start word for events

The original comment on the scanning of the start word on the 2nd pass
did not reflect the actual behaviour (the code was incorrectly masking
bit_idx instead of the pending word itself).

The documented behaviour is not actually required since if event were
pending in the MSBs, they would be immediately scanned anyway as we go
through the loop again.

Update the documentation to reflect this (instead of trying to change
the behaviour).
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBoris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
parent e201bfcc
......@@ -1388,14 +1388,21 @@ static void __xen_evtchn_do_upcall(void)
pending_bits = active_evtchns(cpu, s, word_idx);
bit_idx = 0; /* usually scan entire word from start */
/*
* We scan the starting word in two parts.
*
* 1st time: start in the middle, scanning the
* upper bits.
*
* 2nd time: scan the whole word (not just the
* parts skipped in the first pass) -- if an
* event in the previously scanned bits is
* pending again it would just be scanned on
* the next loop anyway.
*/
if (word_idx == start_word_idx) {
/* We scan the starting word in two parts */
if (i == 0)
/* 1st time: start in the middle */
bit_idx = start_bit_idx;
else
/* 2nd time: mask bits done already */
bit_idx &= (1UL << start_bit_idx) - 1;
}
do {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment