tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async

If we're not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There's no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.

We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I'm not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec79619 ("tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close") took care of it.

This will make the next fix easier.
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/47bde5f649707610eaef9f0d679519966fc31061.1709132643.git.sd@queasysnail.netSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

net/tls/tls_sw.c

@@ -274,9 +274,15 @@ static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
 		DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending) < 1);
 		atomic_inc(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
 	} else {
+		DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
+
 		aead_request_set_callback(aead_req,
 					  CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
-					  crypto_req_done, &ctx->async_wait);
+					  crypto_req_done, &wait);
+		ret = crypto_aead_decrypt(aead_req);
+		if (ret == -EINPROGRESS || ret == -EBUSY)
+			ret = crypto_wait_req(ret, &wait);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = crypto_aead_decrypt(aead_req);
@@ -285,10 +291,7 @@ static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
 		ret = ret ?: -EINPROGRESS;
 	}
 	if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
-		if (darg->async)
-			return 0;
-
-		ret = crypto_wait_req(ret, &ctx->async_wait);
+		return 0;
 	} else if (darg->async) {
 		atomic_dec(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
 	}