drm/nouveau/disp: remove SOR routing updates from supervisor

- these shouldn't be necessary now, and are done in acquire()/release()
- preparation for GSP-RM, where we don't control the supervisor
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <me@dakr.org>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230919220442.202488-23-lyude@redhat.com

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/gf119.c

@@ -1038,7 +1038,6 @@ gf119_disp_super(struct work_struct *work)
 				continue;
 			nv50_disp_super_2_0(disp, head);
 		}
-		nvkm_outp_route(disp);
 		list_for_each_entry(head, &disp->heads, head) {
 			if (!(mask[head->id] & 0x00010000))
 				continue;

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/gv100.c

@@ -863,7 +863,6 @@ gv100_disp_super(struct work_struct *work)
 				continue;
 			nv50_disp_super_2_0(disp, head);
 		}
-		nvkm_outp_route(disp);
 		list_for_each_entry(head, &disp->heads, head) {
 			if (!(mask[head->id] & 0x00010000))
 				continue;

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/nv50.c

@@ -1371,7 +1371,6 @@ nv50_disp_super(struct work_struct *work)
 				continue;
 			nv50_disp_super_2_0(disp, head);
 		}
-		nvkm_outp_route(disp);
 		list_for_each_entry(head, &disp->heads, head) {
 			if (!(super & (0x00000200 << head->id)))
 				continue;