Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
L
linux
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
linux
Commits
438dd926
Commit
438dd926
authored
Oct 11, 2006
by
Steve French
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
[CIFS] Fix leaps year calculation for years after 2100
Signed-off-by:
Steve French
<
sfrench@us.ibm.com
>
parent
268f3be1
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
9 additions
and
0 deletions
+9
-0
fs/cifs/netmisc.c
fs/cifs/netmisc.c
+9
-0
No files found.
fs/cifs/netmisc.c
View file @
438dd926
...
...
@@ -946,6 +946,15 @@ struct timespec cnvrtDosUnixTm(__u16 date, __u16 time)
year
=
sd
->
Year
;
days
+=
year
*
365
;
days
+=
(
year
/
4
);
/* leap year */
/* generalized leap year calculation is more complex, ie no leap year
for years/100 except for years/400, but since the maximum number for DOS
year is 2**7, the last year is 1980+127, which means we need only
consider 2 special case years, ie the years 2000 and 2100, and only
adjust for the lack of leap year for the year 2100, as 2000 was a
leap year (divisable by 400) */
if
(
year
>=
120
)
/* the year 2100 */
days
=
days
-
1
;
/* do not count leap year for the year 2100 */
/* adjust for leap year where we are still before leap day */
days
-=
((
year
&
0x03
)
==
0
)
&&
(
month
<
2
?
1
:
0
);
sec
+=
24
*
60
*
60
*
days
;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment