Commit 46a0b638 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Daniel Vetter

Revert "drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs"

This reverts commit 25ff1195 and the follow on for Valleyview commit 2dc8aae0.

commit 25ff1195
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Thu Apr 4 21:31:03 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs

commit 2dc8aae0
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed May 22 17:08:06 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: Workaround incoherence with fence updates on Valleyview

Jon Bloomfield came up with a plausible explanation and cheap fix
(drm/i915: Fix incoherence with fence updates on Sandybridge+) for the
race condition, so lets run with it.

This is a candidate for stable as the old workaround incurs a
significant cost (calling wbinvd on all CPUs before performing the
register write) for some workloads as noted by Carsten Emde.

Link: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-June/028819.html
References: https://www.osadl.org/?id=1543#c7602
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63825Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent d18b9619
...@@ -2829,56 +2829,17 @@ static inline int fence_number(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, ...@@ -2829,56 +2829,17 @@ static inline int fence_number(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs; return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs;
} }
struct write_fence {
struct drm_device *dev;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
int fence;
};
static void i915_gem_write_fence__ipi(void *data)
{
struct write_fence *args = data;
/* Required for SNB+ with LLC */
wbinvd();
/* Required for VLV */
i915_gem_write_fence(args->dev, args->fence, args->obj);
}
static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence, struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
bool enable) bool enable)
{ {
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
struct write_fence args = { int reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
.dev = obj->base.dev,
.fence = fence_number(dev_priv, fence), i915_gem_write_fence(obj->base.dev, reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
.obj = enable ? obj : NULL,
};
/* In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and
* the update to the fence register we need to take extreme
* measures on SNB+. In theory, the write to the fence register
* flushes all memory transactions before, and coupled with the
* mb() placed around the register write we serialise all memory
* operations with respect to the changes in the tiler. Yet, on
* SNB+ we need to take a step further and emit an explicit wbinvd()
* on each processor in order to manually flush all memory
* transactions before updating the fence register.
*
* However, Valleyview complicates matter. There the wbinvd is
* insufficient and unlike SNB/IVB requires the serialising
* register write. (Note that that register write by itself is
* conversely not sufficient for SNB+.) To compromise, we do both.
*/
if (INTEL_INFO(args.dev)->gen >= 6)
on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, &args, 1);
else
i915_gem_write_fence(args.dev, args.fence, args.obj);
if (enable) { if (enable) {
obj->fence_reg = args.fence; obj->fence_reg = reg;
fence->obj = obj; fence->obj = obj;
list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list); list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
} else { } else {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment