Commit 47fab41a authored by Toshiaki Makita's avatar Toshiaki Makita Committed by David S. Miller

bridge: Don't include NDA_VLAN for FDB entries with vid 0

An FDB entry with vlan_id 0 doesn't mean it is used in vlan 0, but used when
vlan_filtering is disabled.

There is inconsistency around NDA_VLAN whose payload is 0 - even if we add
an entry by RTM_NEWNEIGH without any NDA_VLAN, and even though adding an
entry with NDA_VLAN 0 is prohibited, we get an entry with NDA_VLAN 0 by
RTM_GETNEIGH.

Dumping an FDB entry with vlan_id 0 shouldn't include NDA_VLAN.
Signed-off-by: default avatarToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 7afcaec4
......@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static int fdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_bridge *br,
if (nla_put(skb, NDA_CACHEINFO, sizeof(ci), &ci))
goto nla_put_failure;
if (nla_put(skb, NDA_VLAN, sizeof(u16), &fdb->vlan_id))
if (fdb->vlan_id && nla_put(skb, NDA_VLAN, sizeof(u16), &fdb->vlan_id))
goto nla_put_failure;
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment