Commit 485832a5 authored by Andi Kleen's avatar Andi Kleen Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] x86_64: Use int operations in spinlocks to support more than 128 CPUs spinning.

Pointed out by Eric Dumazet
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 8315eca2
......@@ -18,22 +18,22 @@
*/
#define __raw_spin_is_locked(x) \
(*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->slock) <= 0)
(*(volatile signed int *)(&(x)->slock) <= 0)
#define __raw_spin_lock_string \
"\n1:\t" \
"lock ; decb %0\n\t" \
"lock ; decl %0\n\t" \
"js 2f\n" \
LOCK_SECTION_START("") \
"2:\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"cmpb $0,%0\n\t" \
"cmpl $0,%0\n\t" \
"jle 2b\n\t" \
"jmp 1b\n" \
LOCK_SECTION_END
#define __raw_spin_unlock_string \
"movb $1,%0" \
"movl $1,%0" \
:"=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory"
static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
......@@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
char oldval;
int oldval;
__asm__ __volatile__(
"xchgb %b0,%1"
"xchgl %0,%1"
:"=q" (oldval), "=m" (lock->slock)
:"0" (0) : "memory");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment