Commit 48c13d89 authored by Pavel Begunkov's avatar Pavel Begunkov Committed by Jens Axboe

io_uring: explain io_wq_work::cancel_seq placement

Add a comment on why we keep ->cancel_seq in struct io_wq_work instead
of struct io_kiocb despite it needed only by io_uring but not io-wq.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/988e87eec9dc700b5dae933df3aefef303502f6c.1655310733.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent aa1e90f6
......@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ struct io_wq_work_node *wq_stack_extract(struct io_wq_work_node *stack)
struct io_wq_work {
struct io_wq_work_node list;
unsigned flags;
/* place it here instead of io_kiocb as it fills padding and saves 4B */
int cancel_seq;
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment