[PATCH] fix lost_tick detector for speedstep
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> The patch tries to resolve issues caused by running the TSC based lost tick compensation code on CPUs that change frequency (speedstep, etc). Should the CPU be in slow mode when calibrate_tsc() executes, the kernel will assume we have so many cycles per tick. Later when the cpu speeds up, the kernel will start noting that too many cycles have past since the last interrupt. Since this can occasionally happen, the lost tick compensation code then tries to fix this by incrementing jiffies. Thus every tick we end up incrementing jiffies many times, causing timers to expire too quickly and time to rush ahead. This patch detects when there has been 100 consecutive interrupts where we had to compensate for lost ticks. If this occurs, we spit out a warning and fall back to using the PIT as a time source. I've tested this on my speedstep enabled laptop with success, and others laptop users seeing this problem have reported it works for them. Also to ensure we don't fall back to the slower PIT too quickly, I tested the code on a system I have that looses ~30 ticks about every second and it can still manage to use the TSC as a good time source. This solves most of the "time doubling" problems seen on laptops. Additionally this revision has been modified to use the cleanups made in rename-timer_A1.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment