drm/xe: Fix lockdep warning in xe_force_wake calls
Use spin_lock_irqsave, spin_unlock_irqrestore Fix for below: [13994.811263] ======================================================== [13994.811295] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected [13994.811326] 6.6.0-rc3-xe #2 Tainted: G U [13994.811358] -------------------------------------------------------- [13994.811388] swapper/0/0 just changed the state of lock: [13994.811416] ffff895c7e044db8 (&cpuctx_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: __perf_event_read+0xb7/0x3a0 [13994.811494] but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: [13994.811528] (&fw->lock){+.+.}-{2:2} [13994.811544] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [13994.811606] other info that might help us debug this: [13994.811636] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [13994.811667] CPU0 CPU1 [13994.811691] ---- ---- [13994.811715] lock(&fw->lock); [13994.811744] local_irq_disable(); [13994.811773] lock(&cpuctx_lock); [13994.811810] lock(&fw->lock); [13994.811846] <Interrupt> [13994.811865] lock(&cpuctx_lock); [13994.811895] *** DEADLOCK *** v2: Use spin_lock in atomic context and spin_lock_irq in a non atomic context (Matthew Brost) v3: just use spin_lock_irqsave/restore Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment